Reverting is slower for some days

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi,

Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past. Am
I alone to see the same behavior?

Thanks

Jacques

[Scott Gray-2]

You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server and is a local operation only.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past. Am I alone to see the same behavior?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Thanks Scott,

Actually it's maybe related to Toirtoise. I did not notice that, by default, it is putting files in the recyble bin before
reverting.
Fortunately there is an option to not use the recyble bin, I will try that.

Jacques

From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server and is a local operation only.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past.
> Am I alone to see the same behavior?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>

[Adrian Crum]

You should also empty the recycle bin and do a defragment.

-Adrian

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Thanks Scott,
>
> Actually it's maybe related to Toirtoise. I did not notice that, by
> default, it is putting files in the recyble bin before reverting.
> Fortunately there is an option to not use the recyble bin, I will try that.
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
> You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server and
> is a local operation only.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes
>> with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past. Am I
>> alone to see the same behavior?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>
>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Yes thanks Adrian,

I emptied  the recycle bin (actually I do for 10 mins now :/) and I have Diskeeper (an old version from 2003 but still ok)
continously defragmenting when the screen-saver is on.
I have 4 disks on this machine, it's maybe why  emptying  the recycle bin  is so long. Also, since I have plenty of place, I did not
do it for years, maybe. Looks like it's another piece of the Windows performance puzzle.

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>

> You should also empty the recycle bin and do a defragment.
>
> -Adrian
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Thanks Scott,
>>
>> Actually it's maybe related to Toirtoise. I did not notice that, by default, it is putting files in the recyble bin before
>> reverting.
>> Fortunately there is an option to not use the recyble bin, I will try that.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
>> You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server and is a local operation only.
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>> On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the
>>> past. Am I alone to see the same behavior?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[Adrian Crum]

Years ago when I first installed Tortoise, I noticed it slowed down
Windows Explorer tremendously. I don't think it a Windows issue.

-Adrian

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Yes thanks Adrian,
>
> I emptied  the recycle bin (actually I do for 10 mins now :/) and I have
> Diskeeper (an old version from 2003 but still ok) continously
> defragmenting when the screen-saver is on.
> I have 4 disks on this machine, it's maybe why  emptying  the recycle
> bin  is so long. Also, since I have plenty of place, I did not do it for
> years, maybe. Looks like it's another piece of the Windows performance
> puzzle.
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>> You should also empty the recycle bin and do a defragment.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Thanks Scott,
>>>
>>> Actually it's maybe related to Toirtoise. I did not notice that, by
>>> default, it is putting files in the recyble bin before reverting.
>>> Fortunately there is an option to not use the recyble bin, I will try
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
>>> You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server
>>> and is a local operation only.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> HotWax Media
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>
>>> On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes
>>>> with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past. Am I
>>>> alone to see the same behavior?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Apart this new issue (I hope solved) Tortoise is doing a great job here.

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>

> Years ago when I first installed Tortoise, I noticed it slowed down
> Windows Explorer tremendously. I don't think it a Windows issue.
>
> -Adrian
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Yes thanks Adrian,
>>
>> I emptied  the recycle bin (actually I do for 10 mins now :/) and I have
>> Diskeeper (an old version from 2003 but still ok) continously
>> defragmenting when the screen-saver is on.
>> I have 4 disks on this machine, it's maybe why  emptying  the recycle
>> bin  is so long. Also, since I have plenty of place, I did not do it for
>> years, maybe. Looks like it's another piece of the Windows performance
>> puzzle.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>>> You should also empty the recycle bin and do a defragment.
>>>
>>> -Adrian
>>>
>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> Thanks Scott,
>>>>
>>>> Actually it's maybe related to Toirtoise. I did not notice that, by
>>>> default, it is putting files in the recyble bin before reverting.
>>>> Fortunately there is an option to not use the recyble bin, I will try
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
>>>> You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server
>>>> and is a local operation only.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> HotWax Media
>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>
>>>> On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes
>>>>> with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past. Am I
>>>>> alone to see the same behavior?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Wooo, not using the recycle bin (default in Option/Dialog1) had much effect on Tortoise!

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

> Apart this new issue (I hope solved) Tortoise is doing a great job here.
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>> Years ago when I first installed Tortoise, I noticed it slowed down
>> Windows Explorer tremendously. I don't think it a Windows issue.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Yes thanks Adrian,
>>>
>>> I emptied  the recycle bin (actually I do for 10 mins now :/) and I have
>>> Diskeeper (an old version from 2003 but still ok) continously
>>> defragmenting when the screen-saver is on.
>>> I have 4 disks on this machine, it's maybe why  emptying  the recycle
>>> bin  is so long. Also, since I have plenty of place, I did not do it for
>>> years, maybe. Looks like it's another piece of the Windows performance
>>> puzzle.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>>>> You should also empty the recycle bin and do a defragment.
>>>>
>>>> -Adrian
>>>>
>>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Scott,
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually it's maybe related to Toirtoise. I did not notice that, by
>>>>> default, it is putting files in the recyble bin before reverting.
>>>>> Fortunately there is an option to not use the recyble bin, I will try
>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> You probably are alone, revert has nothing to do with the svn server
>>>>> and is a local operation only.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just to check if it's only on my side. I find that reverting changes
>>>>>> with svn  (in trunk) is much slower than it was in the past. Am I
>>>>>> alone to see the same behavior?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>