Revision 986370

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Revision 986370

Adrian Crum-2
Revision 986370 introduced a dependency from the framework to the accounting component. Accounting-specific requests should be defined at the application level, not at the framework level.

-Adrian



     
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Revision 986370

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Sorry Adrian,

I don't see any relations with the accounting component. BTW, could you be please more specific for those 2 messages you sent (the
one about 935578 also), like giving us line numbers in files, etc.?
For this one, I think your concern has been already addressed by http://markmail.org/message/rkyts3ceugfjahd3 but the
getAssociatedProductsList request-map I forgot to remove from the common-controller. Anyway it's now useless, so it's done at
r1054072

Please let me know if I missed something else

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
> Revision 986370 introduced a dependency from the framework to the accounting component. Accounting-specific requests should be
> defined at the application level, not at the framework level.
>
> -Adrian


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Revision 986370

Adrian Crum-2
That was it - thanks Jacques!

I will try to provide more information in the future.

-Adrian

--- On Fri, 12/31/10, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:

> For this one, I think your concern has been already
> addressed by http://markmail.org/message/rkyts3ceugfjahd3 but the
> getAssociatedProductsList request-map I forgot to remove
> from the common-controller. Anyway it's now useless, so it's
> done at r1054072
>
> Please let me know if I missed something else
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
> > Revision 986370 introduced a dependency from the
> framework to the accounting component. Accounting-specific
> requests should be defined at the application level, not at
> the framework level.
> >
> > -Adrian
>
>
>