SEO friendly URL

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SEO friendly URL

c.schinzer
Hello Hans,


found this link posted earlier om this list as well:

http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=20023&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG

As this is posted in May 2011, can you kindly let us know whether this has
been added via a JIRA ticket?

If so, are you aware of backport to release 10-04 or is this my last
trigger to get me going on 11-04 ?

Thanks & regards


Carsten
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEO friendly URL

hans_bakker
Hi Carsten,

SEO friendlily url's are only in the trunk which we support for more
than 95% of our customers.
They cannot be back ported officially because it is an enhancement.

Upgrade?
As i wrote often, why not to the trunk? We fix blocking errors in the
trunk within hours....

Regards,
Hans


On 03/14/2012 10:29 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:

> Hello Hans,
>
>
> found this link posted earlier om this list as well:
>
> http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=20023&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG
>
> As this is posted in May 2011, can you kindly let us know whether this has
> been added via a JIRA ticket?
>
> If so, are you aware of backport to release 10-04 or is this my last
> trigger to get me going on 11-04 ?
>
> Thanks&  regards
>
>
> Carsten
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEO friendly URL

Mike Z
Hey Hans.  It would be useful if you posted your upgrade schedule, and
which trunk revisions you would consider "stable" enough for production.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Hans Bakker
<[hidden email]>wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
>
> SEO friendlily url's are only in the trunk which we support for more than
> 95% of our customers.
> They cannot be back ported officially because it is an enhancement.
>
> Upgrade?
> As i wrote often, why not to the trunk? We fix blocking errors in the
> trunk within hours....
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
>
> On 03/14/2012 10:29 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
>
>> Hello Hans,
>>
>>
>> found this link posted earlier om this list as well:
>>
>> http://www.antwebsystems.com/**control/ViewBlogArticle?**
>> contentId=20023&blogContentId=**AWS_BLOG<http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=20023&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG>
>>
>> As this is posted in May 2011, can you kindly let us know whether this has
>> been added via a JIRA ticket?
>>
>> If so, are you aware of backport to release 10-04 or is this my last
>> trigger to get me going on 11-04 ?
>>
>> Thanks&  regards
>>
>>
>> Carsten
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEO friendly URL

samhamilton
Talking as end user (sysadmin) and not a developer - we use the latest and greatest version all the time. With upgrades done every couple of days to the head of trunk.

Sam


On 15 Mar 2012, at 11:40, Mike wrote:

> Hey Hans.  It would be useful if you posted your upgrade schedule, and
> which trunk revisions you would consider "stable" enough for production.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Hans Bakker
> <[hidden email]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> SEO friendlily url's are only in the trunk which we support for more than
>> 95% of our customers.
>> They cannot be back ported officially because it is an enhancement.
>>
>> Upgrade?
>> As i wrote often, why not to the trunk? We fix blocking errors in the
>> trunk within hours....
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Hans,
>>>
>>>
>>> found this link posted earlier om this list as well:
>>>
>>> http://www.antwebsystems.com/**control/ViewBlogArticle?**
>>> contentId=20023&blogContentId=**AWS_BLOG<http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=20023&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG>
>>>
>>> As this is posted in May 2011, can you kindly let us know whether this has
>>> been added via a JIRA ticket?
>>>
>>> If so, are you aware of backport to release 10-04 or is this my last
>>> trigger to get me going on 11-04 ?
>>>
>>> Thanks&  regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Carsten
>>>
>>>
>>


smime.p7s (6K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEO friendly URL

hans_bakker
In reply to this post by Mike Z
Hi Mike,

i happens vary rarely that a trunk version is unusable. If it is, it
gets fixed in hours.
If that is not quick enough for you update your version with a previous
revision with the command:

svn up -rxxxxxx

where xxxxxx is the revision you want....which revisions there
are?....check the svn commit mailinglist or the ofbiz forums at the
nabble forum at http://ofbiz.info

Regards,
Hans

On 03/15/2012 10:40 AM, Mike wrote:

> Hey Hans.  It would be useful if you posted your upgrade schedule, and
> which trunk revisions you would consider "stable" enough for production.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Hans Bakker
> <[hidden email]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> SEO friendlily url's are only in the trunk which we support for more than
>> 95% of our customers.
>> They cannot be back ported officially because it is an enhancement.
>>
>> Upgrade?
>> As i wrote often, why not to the trunk? We fix blocking errors in the
>> trunk within hours....
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Hans,
>>>
>>>
>>> found this link posted earlier om this list as well:
>>>
>>> http://www.antwebsystems.com/**control/ViewBlogArticle?**
>>> contentId=20023&blogContentId=**AWS_BLOG<http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=20023&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG>
>>>
>>> As this is posted in May 2011, can you kindly let us know whether this has
>>> been added via a JIRA ticket?
>>>
>>> If so, are you aware of backport to release 10-04 or is this my last
>>> trigger to get me going on 11-04 ?
>>>
>>> Thanks&   regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Carsten
>>>
>>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEO friendly URL

Jacopo Cappellato-4
But please consider that the code in the trunk is not officially approved for release by the OFBiz PMC and so it is not intended for use by the general public (in particular, it is not guaranteed that all the files in the trunk are licensed properly).

Jacopo

On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> i happens vary rarely that a trunk version is unusable. If it is, it gets fixed in hours.
> If that is not quick enough for you update your version with a previous revision with the command:
>
> svn up -rxxxxxx
>
> where xxxxxx is the revision you want....which revisions there are?....check the svn commit mailinglist or the ofbiz forums at the nabble forum at http://ofbiz.info
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On 03/15/2012 10:40 AM, Mike wrote:
>> Hey Hans.  It would be useful if you posted your upgrade schedule, and
>> which trunk revisions you would consider "stable" enough for production.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Hans Bakker
>> <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Carsten,
>>>
>>> SEO friendlily url's are only in the trunk which we support for more than
>>> 95% of our customers.
>>> They cannot be back ported officially because it is an enhancement.
>>>
>>> Upgrade?
>>> As i wrote often, why not to the trunk? We fix blocking errors in the
>>> trunk within hours....
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Hans,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> found this link posted earlier om this list as well:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.antwebsystems.com/**control/ViewBlogArticle?**
>>>> contentId=20023&blogContentId=**AWS_BLOG<http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=20023&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG>
>>>>
>>>> As this is posted in May 2011, can you kindly let us know whether this has
>>>> been added via a JIRA ticket?
>>>>
>>>> If so, are you aware of backport to release 10-04 or is this my last
>>>> trigger to get me going on 11-04 ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks&   regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carsten
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEO friendly URL

Scott.
In reply to this post by hans_bakker
We update from the trunk every other month or so, merge our code and then test and eventually go live. Seems to work out pretty well too.