I am convinced that an IDE will go a long way for easing the adoption curve
of Ofbiz. I have blogged before about ZK-Ofbiz Integration. Over the weekend, I decided to start this project to deliver a Web Delivered IDE for Ofbiz. Here is the initial screenshot of this IDE.It reads real XML files, traversing the directories in an hungry search of XML files. http://www.screencast.com/t/8zNEJsT6y I intend to incorporate any useful feedback into the project.First target is D. Jones comments at http://www.itags.org/java/953436/. It will be interesting to see how a Web Delivered IDE behaves when I actually get to the JPDA. (a long time away). Regards -- Milind |
I'm not sure whether I understood your target. I agree anders_hessellund
classified the community to 3 groups. As a member of the 3rd group, application "customizers", I don't think a Eclipse based IDE will help us. I'll prefer an web-based interface allow us to edit ftl, css, label, service, groovy files online, replace jars, restart component and such functions which are very useful in test and production environments. My 2 cents, Shi Jinghai/Beijing Langhua Ltd. 在 2009-09-29二的 00:03 -0700,Milind Parikh写道: > I am convinced that an IDE will go a long way for easing the adoption curve > of Ofbiz. I have blogged before about ZK-Ofbiz Integration. Over the > weekend, I decided to start this project to deliver a Web Delivered IDE for > Ofbiz. Here is the initial screenshot of this IDE.It reads real XML files, > traversing the directories in an hungry search of XML files. > http://www.screencast.com/t/8zNEJsT6y > > I intend to incorporate any useful feedback into the project.First target is > D. Jones comments at http://www.itags.org/java/953436/. It will be > interesting to see how a Web Delivered IDE behaves when I actually get to > the JPDA. (a long time away). > > Regards > -- Milind |
Catering to group 2 and 3. So, for example, it should be possible to create
a component and a web application and have the skeleton of this working in short order (satisfying"ofBIZ is a RAD tool"). It should also be possible to create ftl files in the specified directories and available for use. etc.. In other words, be a RAD IDE for ofbiz. This is an web based interface (even though it does not look like it). Regards -- Milind On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Shi Jinghai <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm not sure whether I understood your target. I agree anders_hessellund > classified the community to 3 groups. As a member of the 3rd group, > application "customizers", I don't think a Eclipse based IDE will help > us. I'll prefer an web-based interface allow us to edit ftl, css, label, > service, groovy files online, replace jars, restart component and such > functions which are very useful in test and production environments. > > My 2 cents, > > Shi Jinghai/Beijing Langhua Ltd. > > > 在 2009-09-29二的 00:03 -0700,Milind Parikh写道: > > I am convinced that an IDE will go a long way for easing the adoption > curve > > of Ofbiz. I have blogged before about ZK-Ofbiz Integration. Over the > > weekend, I decided to start this project to deliver a Web Delivered IDE > for > > Ofbiz. Here is the initial screenshot of this IDE.It reads real XML > files, > > traversing the directories in an hungry search of XML files. > > http://www.screencast.com/t/8zNEJsT6y > > > > I intend to incorporate any useful feedback into the project.First target > is > > D. Jones comments at http://www.itags.org/java/953436/. It will be > > interesting to see how a Web Delivered IDE behaves when I actually get to > > the JPDA. (a long time away). > > > > Regards > > -- Milind > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |