From: "Pierre Smits" <
[hidden email]>
> This is a reasonable compromise.
>
> My suggestion for the URL regarding the latest stable release:
> http(s)://demo.ofbiz.apache.org
> or:
> http(s)://demo-ofbiz.apache.org
This will not change, it was already difficult to get the names from ASF/infra, sot it will still be trunk, stable and old, with
currently stable=10 and old=9
Christian worked on it this morning and got both stable and old running R10.04 (branch). They are now running R9.04 (branch). I
guess he crossed an issue, or did not want to have stable running 10 already, Christian?
Running branches allows to run revisions with as less bugs as possible
Jacques
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
> Op 23 april 2012 10:25 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]
>> het volgende:
>
>> What we could do is still support it but don't link it from main site and
>> such
>> Because it's very convenient for committers to have another running trunk
>> system
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Pierre Smits" <
[hidden email]>
>>
>> I agree.
>>>
>>> Demo environments is not for OFBiz developers.
>>> If you want to have an OFBiz developer to have a viewpoint on trunk where
>>> they can experience what has been changed in trunk I believe that there
>>> are
>>> betters means available and in place already (SVN, CI reports, etc)
>>>
>>> As far as I can see it, a demo environment of trunk needs to have a
>>> regular
>>> (daily?) deployment of code and demo data. This could potentially lead to
>>> having an upload being done to the demo location at just the moment that a
>>> OFBiz committer has partially uploaded his commits to trunk and the demo
>>> breaks during build and anyone (not only OFBiz developers) experiences a
>>> broken demo. Giving the community unnecessary headaches about fixing the
>>> demo environment than OFBiz.
>>> Look at how often Jacques had to step in to look at why demo-trunk had
>>> been
>>> broken.
>>>
>>> This is not something we should want to have...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> Op 23 april 2012 09:27 schreef Jacopo Cappellato <
>>> jacopo.cappellato@hotwaxmedia.**com <
[hidden email]>>
>>> het volgende:
>>>
>>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I also believe that Jacopo said that something is in the rules,
>>>> regulations
>>>> > and/or guidelines of the ASF about the same issue.
>>>>
>>>> We simply have to make sure it is always clear when a resource is
>>>> unreleased and intended for OFBiz developers only or released and
>>>> intended
>>>> for larger audience.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Locked
