Twitter (again)

[Jacques Le Roux]

OK, now we can't have an official Twitter account for OFBiz or Apache OFBiz since the 2 names are taken
http://twitter.com/OFBiz
http://twitter.com/apache_OFBiz

But anybody cares so it's not an issue :/

Jacques
PS: OK, we could still have apacheofbiz or apache-ofbiz, etc.,  but the situation is not brilliant IMO: confusion
I must say that I don't know who/what is behind http://twitter.com/OFBiz 

[Jeroen van der Wal-2]

You could send a tweet to the Ofbiz account and plea to hand it over
to the community. There's no activity on it.
--
Jeroen van der Wal
Stromboli b.v.
[phone]



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> OK, now we can't have an official Twitter account for OFBiz or Apache OFBiz
> since the 2 names are taken
> http://twitter.com/OFBiz
> http://twitter.com/apache_OFBiz
>
> But anybody cares so it's not an issue :/
>
> Jacques
> PS: OK, we could still have apacheofbiz or apache-ofbiz, etc.,  but the
> situation is not brilliant IMO: confusion
> I must say that I don't know who/what is behind http://twitter.com/OFBiz
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Jeroen,

Thanks for the suggestion.

Actually I took a shower and changed my mind. Let's face it: we can't control what happens on Twitter or such (though Facebook
accounts seems highly unlikely).
I guess the better attitude is what Adrian suggested: the official chanels already exist, most important being the mailing lists.
So from now, like everybody I don't care anymore about Twitter accounts and such, pfew... I feel better :o)

Jacques

From: "Jeroen van der Wal" <[hidden email]>

> You could send a tweet to the Ofbiz account and plea to hand it over
> to the community. There's no activity on it.
> --
> Jeroen van der Wal
> Stromboli b.v.
> [phone]
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> OK, now we can't have an official Twitter account for OFBiz or Apache OFBiz
>> since the 2 names are taken
>> http://twitter.com/OFBiz
>> http://twitter.com/apache_OFBiz
>>
>> But anybody cares so it's not an issue :/
>>
>> Jacques
>> PS: OK, we could still have apacheofbiz or apache-ofbiz, etc., but the
>> situation is not brilliant IMO: confusion
>> I must say that I don't know who/what is behind http://twitter.com/OFBiz
>>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

I don't really care if we have an official twitter account or not, my biggest concern is that no unofficial resources appear to represent the project or the ASF in any way.  I am still somewhat concerned about Hans' apache_ofbiz twitter account and its use of the logos but I really cant be bothered having another argument about it.

Regards
Scott

On 16/03/2010, at 9:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi Jeroen,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Actually I took a shower and changed my mind. Let's face it: we can't control what happens on Twitter or such (though Facebook accounts seems highly unlikely).
> I guess the better attitude is what Adrian suggested: the official chanels already exist, most important being the mailing lists.
> So from now, like everybody I don't care anymore about Twitter accounts and such, pfew... I feel better :o)
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jeroen van der Wal" <[hidden email]>
>> You could send a tweet to the Ofbiz account and plea to hand it over
>> to the community. There's no activity on it.
>> --
>> Jeroen van der Wal
>> Stromboli b.v.
>> [phone]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> OK, now we can't have an official Twitter account for OFBiz or Apache OFBiz
>>> since the 2 names are taken
>>> http://twitter.com/OFBiz
>>> http://twitter.com/apache_OFBiz
>>>
>>> But anybody cares so it's not an issue :/
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>> PS: OK, we could still have apacheofbiz or apache-ofbiz, etc., but the
>>> situation is not brilliant IMO: confusion
>>> I must say that I don't know who/what is behind http://twitter.com/OFBiz
>>>
>
>