Updating Mini-language script files.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Updating Mini-language script files.

Adrian Crum-3
It has been more than a year since I updated the Mini-language grammar.
Mini-language has a built-in feature to auto-correct scripts and update
the original files. I would like to use that feature to update the
script files so they use the new grammar. There will be no functional
change to the scripts.

What do you think?

--
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Updating Mini-language script files.

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Sounds like a good idea to me. Has it been seriously tested already?

Jacques

On Sunday, November 17, 2013 6:51 PM Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:
> It has been more than a year since I updated the Mini-language grammar.
> Mini-language has a built-in feature to auto-correct scripts and update
> the original files. I would like to use that feature to update the
> script files so they use the new grammar. There will be no functional
> change to the scripts.
>
> What do you think?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Updating Mini-language script files.

Adrian Crum-3
It has been tested thoroughly, but the stylesheet is making more changes
than I like. I'm working on fixing that now.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 11/17/2013 1:46 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Sounds like a good idea to me. Has it been seriously tested already?
>
> Jacques
>
> On Sunday, November 17, 2013 6:51 PM Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> It has been more than a year since I updated the Mini-language grammar.
>> Mini-language has a built-in feature to auto-correct scripts and update
>> the original files. I would like to use that feature to update the
>> script files so they use the new grammar. There will be no functional
>> change to the scripts.
>>
>> What do you think?