Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

[Jacques Le Roux]

Was just a friendly information :)


Le 25/01/2017 à 22:11, Michael Brohl a écrit :

> *sigh*
>
> That is completely off topic, Jacques...
>
>
> Am 25.01.17 um 20:48 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>> Thanks Michael,
>>
>> Your message is stamped by the by the seal of reason
>>
>> BTW about stamping, Thunderbird tells me that your email certificate is invalid (was OK yesterday)
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 25/01/2017 à 15:58, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>> inline...
>>>
>>> Am 25.01.17 um 10:04 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>> You are right, it's time to start a new thread, this one is now too confusing.
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan (Schikowski) just told me he will answer us today. I'll wait his answer to start this new thread. It will not be only about demos since
>>>> it seems we are ready to discuss of that again.
>>> It's a good approach to start with a fresh discussion and to collect the requirements.
>>>
>>> Starting from that, we should analyze what can be used from standard OFBiz to meet these requirements, what's been missing and what should be
>>> changed. I hope that Anil can help us there, he had a strong opinion in the discussions of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5312
>>>
>>> We should also analyze the ecomseo approach and see what it adds to solve the requirements. The original contributors might be of help to explain
>>> why they have chosen this approach.
>>>
>>> I'm in favor to stay as objective as possible to get the best out of the contributions. A "my solution is better than yours" discussion does not
>>> help.
>>>
>>> We should also expect that it will take some time to collect and discuss everything and should not force it to a quick solution. That won't help
>>> either.
>>>
>>> And we must be focused leaving out sidenotes or widening the topic too far from the main topic. That will only lead to confusion and possibly end
>>> discussions without result.
>>>
>>> A wiki page might help to note and summarize the findings of the conceptual work and to give contributors an overview (instead of digging through
>>> a long email thread).
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also I just stumbled upon this "Ecommerce Portal Enhancement" Rishi's message by chance http://markmail.org/message/i35qxjelze2x4sja.
>>>>
>>>> It shows there are interests in ecomseo and Rishi started with very useful elements I think and others added some also.
>>> It's an interesting discussion but we should not pull it into this topic (see above).
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Paul Foxworthy]

On 25 January 2017 at 17:57, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
wrote:

I guess you know that most of the spiders bots which are crawling the web
are not doing for the good of websites and users. Better to prevent them to
hurt in any way. OOTB the ecomseo webapp is better than the ecommerce on
this aspect.

Le 25/01/2017 à 03:56, Paul Foxworthy a écrit :

>
>> Are you saying that there are more differences between ecommerce and
>> ecomseo than just the format of the URLs, and that those other differences
>> lead to a security flaw in ecommerce? If that is right, shouldn't the flaw
>> be fixed in its own right, as a separate issue from the exact format of
>> URLs?
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>
> No it's not a security flaw, just that spiders will do a better job using
> ecomseo and there are other features.
>

Hi Jacques,

Can you outline what features are in ecomseo and not ecommerce? Are the
features of ecomseo a superset of those of ecommerce, or are there some
things in ecommerce but not ecomseo?

If there isn't a security flaw, what does ecomseo prevent?

I sincerely do want to understand the issues here, and I don't intend to
criticise anyone.

Thanks

Paul Foxworthy

--
Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd
PO Box 2773
Cheltenham Vic 3192
Australia

Phone: [phone]
Web: http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/
Email: [hidden email]