Using <call-bsh> in minilang
Locked
Using <call-bsh> in minilang
 
|
Re: Using <call-bsh> in minilang
Administrator
|
Re: Using <call-bsh> in minilang
|
|
Re: Using <call-bsh> in minilang
|
|
delegator is always available in the context of a minilang method so you don't need to do anything special to reference it in the call-bsh tag. In the example below, the call-class-method tag could have been used instead as well.
Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 9/03/2011, at 4:23 AM, Justin Robinson wrote: > I was under the impression it was the ofbiz mini-lang not the opentaps > mini-lang, I'm asking about mini-lang syntax not opentaps application > logic.(For this reason I didn't edit out opentaps related code from my > example...) > > I'm trying to discover how parameters are passed around in mini-lang, > nothing to do with opentaps. Online documentation and associated books > haven't made this clear to me. Which is why I'm asking here. > > I think I know at this stage of the game what is related to the ofbiz > framework as opposed to the opentaps implementation...my apologies if > I'm under some strange misapprehension. > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Please ask rather Opentaps questions on Opentaps forum >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Justin Robinson" <[hidden email]> >>> >>> I've been trying to wing it with minilang, it seems pretty straight >>> forward...but I ended up with a situation where I could either go with >>> minlang recursion (no clue how to handle the ins and outs) or a bsh >>> script, since the function I need is already defined in a java class >>> I'm trying to go with the latter. >>> >>> The method I wish to use requires a delegator as an argument, how >>> would I provide this from within a minilang script? >>> Also is it possible to set a field field="field" from-field="declared >>> inside" <call-bsh></call-bsh> tag.(see example) >>> >>> fragment: >>> >>> <!--The objective here is to look up the CustRequestRole entity of >>> roleTypeId: >>> CONTACT, to get the contact partyId so it's email address can be used if >>> there is none on the account --> >>> <if-empty field="parameters.sendTo"> >>> <call-bsh> >>> String contactPartyId = >>> >>> com.opensourcestrategies.crmsfa.cases.UtilCase.getCasePrimaryContactPartyId(delegator, >>> custRequestId)); >>> </call-bsh> >>> <set field="getEmail.partyId" from-field="contactPartyId" /> >>> <call-service service-name="getPartyEmail" >>> in-map-name="getEmail"> >>> <result-to-field result-name="emailAddress" field="parameters.sendTo" /> >>> </call-service> >>> </if-empty> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Justin >>> Venture-Net Research & Development >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Justin > Venture-Net Research & Development |
smime.p7s (3K)
Re: Using <call-bsh> in minilang
|
|
About setting a field, if you return a Map from the bsh script then the contents of the map would be put into the context of the method.
Regards Scott On 9/03/2011, at 9:11 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > delegator is always available in the context of a minilang method so you don't need to do anything special to reference it in the call-bsh tag. In the example below, the call-class-method tag could have been used instead as well. > > Regards > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > On 9/03/2011, at 4:23 AM, Justin Robinson wrote: > >> I was under the impression it was the ofbiz mini-lang not the opentaps >> mini-lang, I'm asking about mini-lang syntax not opentaps application >> logic.(For this reason I didn't edit out opentaps related code from my >> example...) >> >> I'm trying to discover how parameters are passed around in mini-lang, >> nothing to do with opentaps. Online documentation and associated books >> haven't made this clear to me. Which is why I'm asking here. >> >> I think I know at this stage of the game what is related to the ofbiz >> framework as opposed to the opentaps implementation...my apologies if >> I'm under some strange misapprehension. >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Please ask rather Opentaps questions on Opentaps forum >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Justin Robinson" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>> I've been trying to wing it with minilang, it seems pretty straight >>>> forward...but I ended up with a situation where I could either go with >>>> minlang recursion (no clue how to handle the ins and outs) or a bsh >>>> script, since the function I need is already defined in a java class >>>> I'm trying to go with the latter. >>>> >>>> The method I wish to use requires a delegator as an argument, how >>>> would I provide this from within a minilang script? >>>> Also is it possible to set a field field="field" from-field="declared >>>> inside" <call-bsh></call-bsh> tag.(see example) >>>> >>>> fragment: >>>> >>>> <!--The objective here is to look up the CustRequestRole entity of >>>> roleTypeId: >>>> CONTACT, to get the contact partyId so it's email address can be used if >>>> there is none on the account --> >>>> <if-empty field="parameters.sendTo"> >>>> <call-bsh> >>>> String contactPartyId = >>>> >>>> com.opensourcestrategies.crmsfa.cases.UtilCase.getCasePrimaryContactPartyId(delegator, >>>> custRequestId)); >>>> </call-bsh> >>>> <set field="getEmail.partyId" from-field="contactPartyId" /> >>>> <call-service service-name="getPartyEmail" >>>> in-map-name="getEmail"> >>>> <result-to-field result-name="emailAddress" field="parameters.sendTo" /> >>>> </call-service> >>>> </if-empty> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Justin >>>> Venture-Net Research & Development >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Justin >> Venture-Net Research & Development > |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |