VAT is not applied for the shipping
Locked
12
12
Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
 
|
Hi again,
That is to say, with the patch in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160, shipping tax does work for the simple situation. Cheers Paul Foxworthy
--
Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/ |
AW: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Raj, Jacques,
Thanks for your suggestions. I have found a config error I had taken over the _NA_ Tax Authority which was configured to add another 19 percent of VAT to my store prices. Clearing this away helped. Apologies for the long delay. It took a while :-) Regards Carsten Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland -----Original Message----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:52:53 To: <[hidden email]> Reply-To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping To be more clear, what have changed in trunk is the possibilit to have prices with VAT included and code was changed accordingly. So the ProductPrice and OrderAdjustment entities have changed but not The TaxAuthority data model, see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1042542 IIRW there have been some code amendements after Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > It's the same in trunk > > Jacques > > From: "biletnikov" <[hidden email]> >> Hello Paul, >> >> thank you very much for your detailed explanation and solutions. >> I think the first way is the more appropriate for us for the first time, >> but I'm confused what we should do if we had in an order some items with >> shippable tax and some with free shipping tax? Also the each our product >> relates to the appropriate category. >> >> Is this problem actual only for 9.04 release, or the current trunk has it >> too? >> >> Best regards, >> Sergei >> >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Foxworthy [via OFBiz] < >> [hidden email]<ml-node%[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sergei, >>> >>> The trouble is that in the rateProductTaxCalc method, getTaxAdjustments is >>> called once per product, plus once for shipping and once for adjustments. In >>> trunk these are lines 218, 244 and 228 in >>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java?hb=true >>> >>> When we call getTaxAdjustments for shipping and promotion, there's no >>> product, so the product category matching won't work. My change was to look >>> for rows with taxShipping of Y when there's no product. >>> >>> If your shipping is always calculated for an order and not by individual >>> order items, you could set taxShipping to Y for one row in >>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct (TARP) and N for the others. A bit of a hack, but it >>> would work. >>> >>> Another possibility is to define a new TAXABLE product category independent >>> of any other, so you only need one row in TARP. The problem with this is you >>> need to assign a product to the TAXABLE category as you create the product. >>> For me in Australia, pretty well everything is taxed, so most products would >>> need the category set. >>> >>> A third way, again a hack, is to create a dummy product category that no >>> product has, and add a row to TARP with taxShipping of Y. All other TARP >>> rows would have taxShipping of N. >>> >>> A better fix would need more consideration and more work. >>> >>> Some possibilities I can think of: >>> >>> - Add a new column to TARP, perhaps called something like taxRuleType or >>> taxScope. It would have values PRODUCT, SHIPPING, PROMOTION. You would add >>> separate rows for tax rules for shipping and promotion. Each of the three >>> calls to getTaxAdjustment would supply a parameter to say which taxRuleType >>> to search for. >>> >>> - Define entirely separate entities for tax rules for shipping and >>> promotions rather than overload TARP >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Paul Foxworthy >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >>> below: >>> >>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253480.html >>> To unsubscribe from VAT is not applied for the shipping, click >>> here< >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Sergei Biletnikov >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253536.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > |
Re: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
Administrator
|
BTW, I vaguely remember a Jira and a patch have been created, should we review?
Thanks Jacques From: <[hidden email]> > Raj, Jacques, > > > Thanks for your suggestions. I have found a config error > I had taken over the _NA_ Tax Authority which was configured to add another 19 percent of VAT to my store prices. > Clearing this away helped. > > Apologies for the long delay. It took a while :-) > > Regards > > > Carsten > Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:52:53 > To: <[hidden email]> > Reply-To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping > > To be more clear, what have changed in trunk is the possibilit to have prices with VAT included and code was changed accordingly. > So the ProductPrice and OrderAdjustment entities have changed but not The TaxAuthority data model, see > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1042542 > > IIRW there have been some code amendements after > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> It's the same in trunk >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "biletnikov" <[hidden email]> >>> Hello Paul, >>> >>> thank you very much for your detailed explanation and solutions. >>> I think the first way is the more appropriate for us for the first time, >>> but I'm confused what we should do if we had in an order some items with >>> shippable tax and some with free shipping tax? Also the each our product >>> relates to the appropriate category. >>> >>> Is this problem actual only for 9.04 release, or the current trunk has it >>> too? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Sergei >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Foxworthy [via OFBiz] < >>> [hidden email]<ml-node%[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sergei, >>>> >>>> The trouble is that in the rateProductTaxCalc method, getTaxAdjustments is >>>> called once per product, plus once for shipping and once for adjustments. In >>>> trunk these are lines 218, 244 and 228 in >>>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java?hb=true >>>> >>>> When we call getTaxAdjustments for shipping and promotion, there's no >>>> product, so the product category matching won't work. My change was to look >>>> for rows with taxShipping of Y when there's no product. >>>> >>>> If your shipping is always calculated for an order and not by individual >>>> order items, you could set taxShipping to Y for one row in >>>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct (TARP) and N for the others. A bit of a hack, but it >>>> would work. >>>> >>>> Another possibility is to define a new TAXABLE product category independent >>>> of any other, so you only need one row in TARP. The problem with this is you >>>> need to assign a product to the TAXABLE category as you create the product. >>>> For me in Australia, pretty well everything is taxed, so most products would >>>> need the category set. >>>> >>>> A third way, again a hack, is to create a dummy product category that no >>>> product has, and add a row to TARP with taxShipping of Y. All other TARP >>>> rows would have taxShipping of N. >>>> >>>> A better fix would need more consideration and more work. >>>> >>>> Some possibilities I can think of: >>>> >>>> - Add a new column to TARP, perhaps called something like taxRuleType or >>>> taxScope. It would have values PRODUCT, SHIPPING, PROMOTION. You would add >>>> separate rows for tax rules for shipping and promotion. Each of the three >>>> calls to getTaxAdjustment would supply a parameter to say which taxRuleType >>>> to search for. >>>> >>>> - Define entirely separate entities for tax rules for shipping and >>>> promotions rather than overload TARP >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Paul Foxworthy >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >>>> below: >>>> >>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253480.html >>>> To unsubscribe from VAT is not applied for the shipping, click >>>> here< >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Sergei Biletnikov >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253536.html >>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> > > > |
Re: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
|
|
Hi Jacques,
The Jira is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 My patch is a simple fix for shipping and promotions in the situation where there's only one row for a given tax authority in TaxAuthorityRateProduct. Where there are multiple rows for a tax authority and different product categories, you can still end up with tax added only once to the shipping, but its a bit of a hack. See my discussion in the history below from Feb 2 for more on what the patch does do, and its limitations, i.e. what it doesn't do that would require more work. IMHO the patch is worth having until we manage tax for per-order shipping and promotions totally independently of product categories. I gather Sergei ran with it to fix his immediate problem. Since I wrote that on Feb 2, I've had one more thought about the long-term fix for the situation. How about creating a new entity something like TaxAuthorityRateProduct but mapping OrderAdjustmentType to tax rules? Then we would look at this new entity to make decisions about shipping, promotions and possibly other order adjustments. Cheers Paul Foxworthy
--
Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/ |
Re: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
|
Administrator
|
Thanks Paul,
I still wonder if we could not handle it a the UI level with the current data model. Since promo and shipping are for the total order (or ship groups for shipping, maybe have to check that, but I think it's ok, the same apply to each ship group) we could use the 1st simple solution you suggested and Sergei used. The UI would then handle the fact that in TaxAuthorityRateProduct you can have only one line with Tax Ship = Y or/and Tax Promo =Y. It's still a hack but at least, with your patch, even without some explanation (a simple line above the list shoud be enough) it would be easy to use and does not need a lot of effort and refactoring. Mmm, but yes the UI would still be misleading and Tax Ship = Y.N or/and Tax Promo =Y/N should be done apart and note in TaxAuthorityRateProduct since they are not at the OrderItem level but OrderHeader and actually not related to any ProductCategory. At this stage, I must say having had a quick look at rateProductTaxCalc and getTaxAdjustments I have not a clear vision on how your new proposed solution would work. Jacques From: "Paul Foxworthy" <[hidden email]> > Hi Jacques, > > The Jira is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 > > My patch is a simple fix for shipping and promotions in the situation where > there's only one row for a given tax authority in TaxAuthorityRateProduct. > > Where there are multiple rows for a tax authority and different product > categories, you can still end up with tax added only once to the shipping, > but its a bit of a hack. See my discussion in the history below from Feb 2 > for more on what the patch does do, and its limitations, i.e. what it > doesn't do that would require more work. > > IMHO the patch is worth having until we manage tax for per-order shipping > and promotions totally independently of product categories. I gather Sergei > ran with it to fix his immediate problem. > > Since I wrote that on Feb 2, I've had one more thought about the long-term > fix for the situation. How about creating a new entity something like > TaxAuthorityRateProduct but mapping OrderAdjustmentType to tax rules? Then > we would look at this new entity to make decisions about shipping, > promotions and possibly other order adjustments. > > Cheers > > Paul Foxworthy > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> BTW, I vaguely remember a Jira and a patch have been created, should we >> review? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: <[hidden email]> >>> Raj, Jacques, >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your suggestions. I have found a config error >>> I had taken over the _NA_ Tax Authority which was configured to add >>> another 19 percent of VAT to my store prices. >>> Clearing this away helped. >>> >>> Apologies for the long delay. It took a while :-) >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> Carsten >>> Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:52:53 >>> To: <[hidden email]> >>> Reply-To: [hidden email] >>> Subject: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping >>> >>> To be more clear, what have changed in trunk is the possibilit to have >>> prices with VAT included and code was changed accordingly. >>> So the ProductPrice and OrderAdjustment entities have changed but not The >>> TaxAuthority data model, see >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1042542 >>> >>> IIRW there have been some code amendements after >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>> It's the same in trunk >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "biletnikov" <[hidden email]> >>>>> Hello Paul, >>>>> >>>>> thank you very much for your detailed explanation and solutions. >>>>> I think the first way is the more appropriate for us for the first >>>>> time, >>>>> but I'm confused what we should do if we had in an order some items >>>>> with >>>>> shippable tax and some with free shipping tax? Also the each our >>>>> product >>>>> relates to the appropriate category. >>>>> >>>>> Is this problem actual only for 9.04 release, or the current trunk has >>>>> it >>>>> too? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Sergei >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Foxworthy [via OFBiz] < >>>>> [hidden email]<ml-node%[hidden email]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sergei, >>>>>> >>>>>> The trouble is that in the rateProductTaxCalc method, >>>>>> getTaxAdjustments is >>>>>> called once per product, plus once for shipping and once for >>>>>> adjustments. In >>>>>> trunk these are lines 218, 244 and 228 in >>>>>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java?hb=true >>>>>> >>>>>> When we call getTaxAdjustments for shipping and promotion, there's no >>>>>> product, so the product category matching won't work. My change was to >>>>>> look >>>>>> for rows with taxShipping of Y when there's no product. >>>>>> >>>>>> If your shipping is always calculated for an order and not by >>>>>> individual >>>>>> order items, you could set taxShipping to Y for one row in >>>>>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct (TARP) and N for the others. A bit of a hack, >>>>>> but it >>>>>> would work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Another possibility is to define a new TAXABLE product category >>>>>> independent >>>>>> of any other, so you only need one row in TARP. The problem with this >>>>>> is you >>>>>> need to assign a product to the TAXABLE category as you create the >>>>>> product. >>>>>> For me in Australia, pretty well everything is taxed, so most products >>>>>> would >>>>>> need the category set. >>>>>> >>>>>> A third way, again a hack, is to create a dummy product category that >>>>>> no >>>>>> product has, and add a row to TARP with taxShipping of Y. All other >>>>>> TARP >>>>>> rows would have taxShipping of N. >>>>>> >>>>>> A better fix would need more consideration and more work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some possibilities I can think of: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Add a new column to TARP, perhaps called something like taxRuleType >>>>>> or >>>>>> taxScope. It would have values PRODUCT, SHIPPING, PROMOTION. You would >>>>>> add >>>>>> separate rows for tax rules for shipping and promotion. Each of the >>>>>> three >>>>>> calls to getTaxAdjustment would supply a parameter to say which >>>>>> taxRuleType >>>>>> to search for. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Define entirely separate entities for tax rules for shipping and >>>>>> promotions rather than overload TARP >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Foxworthy >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >>>>>> discussion >>>>>> below: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253480.html >>>>>> To unsubscribe from VAT is not applied for the shipping, click >>>>>> here< >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Sergei Biletnikov >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253536.html >>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3302338.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > |
Re: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
|
|
Hi Jacques,
I do believe I'm in total agreement with you :-). I have no objection to adding a note to the TaxAuthorityRateProduct maintenance screen to say that Tax Ship and Tax Promo should only be Y once for a given tax authority. In the long term, I think that will not be a complete solution. There are several order adjustment types. We cope with shipping and promotional pricing, but if other order adjustments are added to an order, they might also require a tax charge. What I had in mind as a long term fix was generalising the calcTax service and rateProductTaxCalc (line 141 in https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java) to take a list of order adjustments, instead of specifically one shipping and one promotion amount. The calls to getTaxAdjustments on lines 224 and 228 would be changed to call a separate method that searches a different table, not TaxAuthorityRateProduct. This new table would define tax rules for the various order adjustment types, much as TARP defines tax rules for product categories. I have higher prioirities, so I don't expect to work on this anytime soon, and maybe there's a better design than the one I have thought of anyway. Comments anyone? Cheers Paul Foxworthy
--
Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/ |
Re: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
|
Administrator
|
Thanks Paul,
For now, I will do the simple one with an explanation on the screen, but will not commit before having also a js script enforcing the rule Jacques From: "Paul Foxworthy" <[hidden email]> > Hi Jacques, > > I do believe I'm in total agreement with you :-). > > I have no objection to adding a note to the TaxAuthorityRateProduct > maintenance screen to say that Tax Ship and Tax Promo should only be Y once > for a given tax authority. > > In the long term, I think that will not be a complete solution. There are > several order adjustment types. We cope with shipping and promotional > pricing, but if other order adjustments are added to an order, they might > also require a tax charge. > > What I had in mind as a long term fix was generalising the calcTax service > and rateProductTaxCalc (line 141 in > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java > ) to take a list of order adjustments, instead of specifically one shipping > and one promotion amount. > > The calls to getTaxAdjustments on lines 224 and 228 would be changed to call > a separate method that searches a different table, not > TaxAuthorityRateProduct. This new table would define tax rules for the > various order adjustment types, much as TARP defines tax rules for product > categories. > > I have higher prioirities, so I don't expect to work on this anytime soon, > and maybe there's a better design than the one I have thought of anyway. > > Comments anyone? > > Cheers > > Paul Foxworthy > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> Thanks Paul, >> >> I still wonder if we could not handle it a the UI level with the current >> data model. Since promo and shipping are for the total >> order (or ship groups for shipping, maybe have to check that, but I think >> it's ok, the same apply to each ship group) we could use >> the 1st simple solution you suggested and Sergei used. The UI would then >> handle the fact that in TaxAuthorityRateProduct you can >> have only one line with Tax Ship = Y or/and Tax Promo =Y. It's still a >> hack but at least, with your patch, even without some >> explanation (a simple line above the list shoud be enough) it would be >> easy to use and does not need a lot of effort and >> refactoring. >> >> Mmm, but yes the UI would still be misleading and Tax Ship = Y.N or/and >> Tax Promo =Y/N should be done apart and note in >> TaxAuthorityRateProduct since they are not at the OrderItem level but >> OrderHeader and actually not related to any ProductCategory. >> At this stage, I must say having had a quick look at rateProductTaxCalc >> and getTaxAdjustments I have not a clear vision on how your >> new proposed solution would work. >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Paul Foxworthy" <[hidden email]> >>> Hi Jacques, >>> >>> The Jira is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 >>> >>> My patch is a simple fix for shipping and promotions in the situation >>> where >>> there's only one row for a given tax authority in >>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct. >>> >>> Where there are multiple rows for a tax authority and different product >>> categories, you can still end up with tax added only once to the >>> shipping, >>> but its a bit of a hack. See my discussion in the history below from Feb >>> 2 >>> for more on what the patch does do, and its limitations, i.e. what it >>> doesn't do that would require more work. >>> >>> IMHO the patch is worth having until we manage tax for per-order shipping >>> and promotions totally independently of product categories. I gather >>> Sergei >>> ran with it to fix his immediate problem. >>> >>> Since I wrote that on Feb 2, I've had one more thought about the >>> long-term >>> fix for the situation. How about creating a new entity something like >>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct but mapping OrderAdjustmentType to tax rules? >>> Then >>> we would look at this new entity to make decisions about shipping, >>> promotions and possibly other order adjustments. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Paul Foxworthy >>> >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>> BTW, I vaguely remember a Jira and a patch have been created, should we >>>> review? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: <[hidden email]> >>>>> Raj, Jacques, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your suggestions. I have found a config error >>>>> I had taken over the _NA_ Tax Authority which was configured to add >>>>> another 19 percent of VAT to my store prices. >>>>> Clearing this away helped. >>>>> >>>>> Apologies for the long delay. It took a while :-) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Carsten >>>>> Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:52:53 >>>>> To: <[hidden email]> >>>>> Reply-To: [hidden email] >>>>> Subject: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping >>>>> >>>>> To be more clear, what have changed in trunk is the possibilit to have >>>>> prices with VAT included and code was changed accordingly. >>>>> So the ProductPrice and OrderAdjustment entities have changed but not >>>>> The >>>>> TaxAuthority data model, see >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1042542 >>>>> >>>>> IIRW there have been some code amendements after >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> It's the same in trunk >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "biletnikov" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> Hello Paul, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thank you very much for your detailed explanation and solutions. >>>>>>> I think the first way is the more appropriate for us for the first >>>>>>> time, >>>>>>> but I'm confused what we should do if we had in an order some items >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> shippable tax and some with free shipping tax? Also the each our >>>>>>> product >>>>>>> relates to the appropriate category. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this problem actual only for 9.04 release, or the current trunk >>>>>>> has >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Sergei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Foxworthy [via OFBiz] < >>>>>>> [hidden email]<ml-node%[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Sergei, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The trouble is that in the rateProductTaxCalc method, >>>>>>>> getTaxAdjustments is >>>>>>>> called once per product, plus once for shipping and once for >>>>>>>> adjustments. In >>>>>>>> trunk these are lines 218, 244 and 228 in >>>>>>>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java?hb=true >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When we call getTaxAdjustments for shipping and promotion, there's >>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>> product, so the product category matching won't work. My change was >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>> for rows with taxShipping of Y when there's no product. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If your shipping is always calculated for an order and not by >>>>>>>> individual >>>>>>>> order items, you could set taxShipping to Y for one row in >>>>>>>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct (TARP) and N for the others. A bit of a >>>>>>>> hack, >>>>>>>> but it >>>>>>>> would work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Another possibility is to define a new TAXABLE product category >>>>>>>> independent >>>>>>>> of any other, so you only need one row in TARP. The problem with >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> is you >>>>>>>> need to assign a product to the TAXABLE category as you create the >>>>>>>> product. >>>>>>>> For me in Australia, pretty well everything is taxed, so most >>>>>>>> products >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> need the category set. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A third way, again a hack, is to create a dummy product category >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>> product has, and add a row to TARP with taxShipping of Y. All other >>>>>>>> TARP >>>>>>>> rows would have taxShipping of N. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A better fix would need more consideration and more work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some possibilities I can think of: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Add a new column to TARP, perhaps called something like >>>>>>>> taxRuleType >>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>> taxScope. It would have values PRODUCT, SHIPPING, PROMOTION. You >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> add >>>>>>>> separate rows for tax rules for shipping and promotion. Each of the >>>>>>>> three >>>>>>>> calls to getTaxAdjustment would supply a parameter to say which >>>>>>>> taxRuleType >>>>>>>> to search for. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Define entirely separate entities for tax rules for shipping and >>>>>>>> promotions rather than overload TARP >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul Foxworthy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>> below: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253480.html >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from VAT is not applied for the shipping, click >>>>>>>> here< >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Sergei Biletnikov >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253536.html >>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3302338.html >>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3303377.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > |
Re: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping
|
Administrator
|
As I don't want to stay forever with this TODO in my mind, I changed it (my mind ;o)
I will commit your change with an explanation on the screen for now. Later I will add the a js script to enforce it Thanks Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > Thanks Paul, > > For now, I will do the simple one with an explanation on the screen, but will not commit before having also a js script enforcing > the rule > > Jacques > > From: "Paul Foxworthy" <[hidden email]> >> Hi Jacques, >> >> I do believe I'm in total agreement with you :-). >> >> I have no objection to adding a note to the TaxAuthorityRateProduct >> maintenance screen to say that Tax Ship and Tax Promo should only be Y once >> for a given tax authority. >> >> In the long term, I think that will not be a complete solution. There are >> several order adjustment types. We cope with shipping and promotional >> pricing, but if other order adjustments are added to an order, they might >> also require a tax charge. >> >> What I had in mind as a long term fix was generalising the calcTax service >> and rateProductTaxCalc (line 141 in >> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java >> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java >> ) to take a list of order adjustments, instead of specifically one shipping >> and one promotion amount. >> >> The calls to getTaxAdjustments on lines 224 and 228 would be changed to call >> a separate method that searches a different table, not >> TaxAuthorityRateProduct. This new table would define tax rules for the >> various order adjustment types, much as TARP defines tax rules for product >> categories. >> >> I have higher prioirities, so I don't expect to work on this anytime soon, >> and maybe there's a better design than the one I have thought of anyway. >> >> Comments anyone? >> >> Cheers >> >> Paul Foxworthy >> >> >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Paul, >>> >>> I still wonder if we could not handle it a the UI level with the current >>> data model. Since promo and shipping are for the total >>> order (or ship groups for shipping, maybe have to check that, but I think >>> it's ok, the same apply to each ship group) we could use >>> the 1st simple solution you suggested and Sergei used. The UI would then >>> handle the fact that in TaxAuthorityRateProduct you can >>> have only one line with Tax Ship = Y or/and Tax Promo =Y. It's still a >>> hack but at least, with your patch, even without some >>> explanation (a simple line above the list shoud be enough) it would be >>> easy to use and does not need a lot of effort and >>> refactoring. >>> >>> Mmm, but yes the UI would still be misleading and Tax Ship = Y.N or/and >>> Tax Promo =Y/N should be done apart and note in >>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct since they are not at the OrderItem level but >>> OrderHeader and actually not related to any ProductCategory. >>> At this stage, I must say having had a quick look at rateProductTaxCalc >>> and getTaxAdjustments I have not a clear vision on how your >>> new proposed solution would work. >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Paul Foxworthy" <[hidden email]> >>>> Hi Jacques, >>>> >>>> The Jira is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4160 >>>> >>>> My patch is a simple fix for shipping and promotions in the situation >>>> where >>>> there's only one row for a given tax authority in >>>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct. >>>> >>>> Where there are multiple rows for a tax authority and different product >>>> categories, you can still end up with tax added only once to the >>>> shipping, >>>> but its a bit of a hack. See my discussion in the history below from Feb >>>> 2 >>>> for more on what the patch does do, and its limitations, i.e. what it >>>> doesn't do that would require more work. >>>> >>>> IMHO the patch is worth having until we manage tax for per-order shipping >>>> and promotions totally independently of product categories. I gather >>>> Sergei >>>> ran with it to fix his immediate problem. >>>> >>>> Since I wrote that on Feb 2, I've had one more thought about the >>>> long-term >>>> fix for the situation. How about creating a new entity something like >>>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct but mapping OrderAdjustmentType to tax rules? >>>> Then >>>> we would look at this new entity to make decisions about shipping, >>>> promotions and possibly other order adjustments. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Paul Foxworthy >>>> >>>> >>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>> BTW, I vaguely remember a Jira and a patch have been created, should we >>>>> review? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: <[hidden email]> >>>>>> Raj, Jacques, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your suggestions. I have found a config error >>>>>> I had taken over the _NA_ Tax Authority which was configured to add >>>>>> another 19 percent of VAT to my store prices. >>>>>> Clearing this away helped. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apologies for the long delay. It took a while :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Carsten >>>>>> Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:52:53 >>>>>> To: <[hidden email]> >>>>>> Reply-To: [hidden email] >>>>>> Subject: Re: VAT is not applied for the shipping >>>>>> >>>>>> To be more clear, what have changed in trunk is the possibilit to have >>>>>> prices with VAT included and code was changed accordingly. >>>>>> So the ProductPrice and OrderAdjustment entities have changed but not >>>>>> The >>>>>> TaxAuthority data model, see >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1042542 >>>>>> >>>>>> IIRW there have been some code amendements after >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> It's the same in trunk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "biletnikov" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Hello Paul, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thank you very much for your detailed explanation and solutions. >>>>>>>> I think the first way is the more appropriate for us for the first >>>>>>>> time, >>>>>>>> but I'm confused what we should do if we had in an order some items >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> shippable tax and some with free shipping tax? Also the each our >>>>>>>> product >>>>>>>> relates to the appropriate category. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this problem actual only for 9.04 release, or the current trunk >>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> too? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> Sergei >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Foxworthy [via OFBiz] < >>>>>>>> [hidden email]<ml-node%[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Sergei, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The trouble is that in the rateProductTaxCalc method, >>>>>>>>> getTaxAdjustments is >>>>>>>>> called once per product, plus once for shipping and once for >>>>>>>>> adjustments. In >>>>>>>>> trunk these are lines 218, 244 and 228 in >>>>>>>>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/TaxAuthorityServices.java?hb=true >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When we call getTaxAdjustments for shipping and promotion, there's >>>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>> product, so the product category matching won't work. My change was >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>>> for rows with taxShipping of Y when there's no product. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If your shipping is always calculated for an order and not by >>>>>>>>> individual >>>>>>>>> order items, you could set taxShipping to Y for one row in >>>>>>>>> TaxAuthorityRateProduct (TARP) and N for the others. A bit of a >>>>>>>>> hack, >>>>>>>>> but it >>>>>>>>> would work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Another possibility is to define a new TAXABLE product category >>>>>>>>> independent >>>>>>>>> of any other, so you only need one row in TARP. The problem with >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> is you >>>>>>>>> need to assign a product to the TAXABLE category as you create the >>>>>>>>> product. >>>>>>>>> For me in Australia, pretty well everything is taxed, so most >>>>>>>>> products >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> need the category set. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A third way, again a hack, is to create a dummy product category >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>> product has, and add a row to TARP with taxShipping of Y. All other >>>>>>>>> TARP >>>>>>>>> rows would have taxShipping of N. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A better fix would need more consideration and more work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some possibilities I can think of: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Add a new column to TARP, perhaps called something like >>>>>>>>> taxRuleType >>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>> taxScope. It would have values PRODUCT, SHIPPING, PROMOTION. You >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> add >>>>>>>>> separate rows for tax rules for shipping and promotion. Each of the >>>>>>>>> three >>>>>>>>> calls to getTaxAdjustment would supply a parameter to say which >>>>>>>>> taxRuleType >>>>>>>>> to search for. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Define entirely separate entities for tax rules for shipping and >>>>>>>>> promotions rather than overload TARP >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Paul Foxworthy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>> below: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253480.html >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from VAT is not applied for the shipping, click >>>>>>>>> here< >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> Sergei Biletnikov >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3253536.html >>>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3302338.html >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VAT-is-not-applied-for-the-shipping-tp3234699p3303377.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > |
Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
|
Hey,
Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. Regards Ankit Arora ::DISCLAIMER:: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and attachments please check them for viruses and defect. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
|
to my knowledge it is not in the trunk
feel free to describe it function so others can give you preliminary feed back with out having to research it themselves. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:04 PM: > Hey, > > Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. > > Regards > Ankit Arora > > ::DISCLAIMER:: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. > It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in > this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. > Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of > this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and > attachments please check them for viruses and defect. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
RE: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
|
Hey,
What all other Content Management Systems are possible, that can be used with Ofbiz ? -----Original Message----- From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:06 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz to my knowledge it is not in the trunk feel free to describe it function so others can give you preliminary feed back with out having to research it themselves. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:04 PM: > Hey, > > Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. > > Regards > Ankit Arora > > ::DISCLAIMER:: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. > It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in > this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. > Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of > this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and > attachments please check them for viruses and defect. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
|
Hippo was discussed and our own flavor but nothing has moved as of yet.
I use front page to created non ofbiz pages then integrated them starting with the index.jsp. I also use the content manager which you can plow through. the help pages are not flushed out yet,so going through the demo-trunk would help. https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/content/control/CMSContentFind?USERNAME=flexadmin&PASSWORD=ofbiz&JavaScriptEnabled=Y ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:43 PM: > Hey, > > What all other Content Management Systems are possible, that can be used with Ofbiz ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:06 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz > > to my knowledge it is not in the trunk > feel free to describe it function so others can give you preliminary > feed back with out having to research it themselves. > > > > ========================= > > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > > Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:04 PM: >> Hey, >> >> Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. >> >> Regards >> Ankit Arora >> >> ::DISCLAIMER:: >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. >> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in >> this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. >> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of >> this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and >> attachments please check them for viruses and defect. >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > |
Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Ankit Arora
You could try Magnolia https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Magnolia+CMS+Integration+Guide
I never tried... Jacques From: "Ankit Arora" <[hidden email]> > Hey, > > What all other Content Management Systems are possible, that can be used with Ofbiz ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:06 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz > > to my knowledge it is not in the trunk > feel free to describe it function so others can give you preliminary > feed back with out having to research it themselves. > > > > ========================= > > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > > Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:04 PM: >> Hey, >> >> Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. >> >> Regards >> Ankit Arora >> >> ::DISCLAIMER:: >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. >> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in >> this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. >> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of >> this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and >> attachments please check them for viruses and defect. >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > |
RE: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
|
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Hey,
Actually I want to use Alfresco's CMS in place of Ofbiz's CMS.... Guide with the steps on "How to integrate it with a third party system/application?" Regards Ankit Arora -----Original Message----- From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:44 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz Hippo was discussed and our own flavor but nothing has moved as of yet. I use front page to created non ofbiz pages then integrated them starting with the index.jsp. I also use the content manager which you can plow through. the help pages are not flushed out yet,so going through the demo-trunk would help. https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/content/control/CMSContentFind?USERNAME=flexadmin&PASSWORD=ofbiz&JavaScriptEnabled=Y ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:43 PM: > Hey, > > What all other Content Management Systems are possible, that can be used with Ofbiz ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:06 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz > > to my knowledge it is not in the trunk > feel free to describe it function so others can give you preliminary > feed back with out having to research it themselves. > > > > ========================= > > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > > Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:04 PM: >> Hey, >> >> Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. >> >> Regards >> Ankit Arora >> >> ::DISCLAIMER:: >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. >> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in >> this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. >> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of >> this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and >> attachments please check them for viruses and defect. >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > |
Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz
|
|
if you are a end user you will need to hire a consultant that is
familiar with ofbiz to do this for you. if your are a developer you will need to understand how ofbiz works and develop your own how-to. click in the documentation link on the main page of ofbiz. going through the videos would give you a good overview. Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/16/2011 2:29 AM: > Hey, > > Actually I want to use Alfresco's CMS in place of Ofbiz's CMS.... > Guide with the steps on "How to integrate it with a third party system/application?" > > > Regards > Ankit Arora > > -----Original Message----- > From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:44 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz > > Hippo was discussed and our own flavor but nothing has moved as of yet. > I use front page to created non ofbiz pages then integrated them > starting with the index.jsp. > I also use the content manager which you can plow through. > the help pages are not flushed out yet,so going through the demo-trunk > would help. > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/content/control/CMSContentFind?USERNAME=flexadmin&PASSWORD=ofbiz&JavaScriptEnabled=Y > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > > Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:43 PM: >> Hey, >> >> What all other Content Management Systems are possible, that can be used with Ofbiz ? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:06 AM >> To: [hidden email] >> Subject: Re: Integration of Alfresco with Ofbiz >> >> to my knowledge it is not in the trunk >> feel free to describe it function so others can give you preliminary >> feed back with out having to research it themselves. >> >> >> >> ========================= >> >> BJ Freeman >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> >> >> Ankit Arora sent the following on 2/15/2011 8:04 PM: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Is it possible to integrate Alfresco with ofbiz? And if it is, then please guide and provide the steps for the same. >>> >>> Regards >>> Ankit Arora >>> >>> ::DISCLAIMER:: >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. >>> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in >>> this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. >>> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of >>> this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have >>> received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and >>> attachments please check them for viruses and defect. >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > |
«
Return to OFBiz - User
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |