Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product
vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to help that are trusted by the PMC. Please vote, +1 to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for vulnerability handling. [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ |
+1
The "private" mailing list is only for PMC members of the project? Regards, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH www.ecomify.de Am 24.07.16 um 14:32 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1
2016-07-24 14:32 GMT+02:00 Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]>: > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > -- Grégory Draperi |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Michael Brohl-3
Yes Michael.
+1 for me also for the security list I noted that this will allow your contact info to be published here: https://www.apache.org/security/projects.html Thanks Jacques Le 24/07/2016 à 14:43, Michael Brohl a écrit : > +1 > > The "private" mailing list is only for PMC members of the project? > > Regards, > Michael Brohl > ecomify GmbH > www.ecomify.de > > > Am 24.07.16 um 14:32 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: >> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product >> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this >> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could >> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could >> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to >> help that are trusted by the PMC. >> >> Please vote, >> >> +1 >> >> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all >> the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on >> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the >> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve >> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. >> >> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for >> vulnerability handling. >> >> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ >> > > |
Administrator
|
Le 24/07/2016 à 14:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Yes Michael. > > +1 for me also for the security list > > I noted that this will allow your contact info to be published here: https://www.apache.org/security/projects.html Typo, it's : our contact info Jacques > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Le 24/07/2016 à 14:43, Michael Brohl a écrit : >> +1 >> >> The "private" mailing list is only for PMC members of the project? >> >> Regards, >> Michael Brohl >> ecomify GmbH >> www.ecomify.de >> >> >> Am 24.07.16 um 14:32 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product >>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this >>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could >>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could >>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to >>> help that are trusted by the PMC. >>> >>> Please vote, >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all >>> the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on >>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the >>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve >>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. >>> >>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for >>> vulnerability handling. >>> >>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ >>> >> >> > > |
+1 good idea
On Jul 24, 2016 3:56 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: Le 24/07/2016 à 14:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Yes Michael. > > +1 for me also for the security list > > I noted that this will allow your contact info to be published here: > https://www.apache.org/security/projects.html > Typo, it's : our contact info Jacques > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Le 24/07/2016 à 14:43, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> The "private" mailing list is only for PMC members of the project? >> >> Regards, >> Michael Brohl >> ecomify GmbH >> www.ecomify.de >> >> >> Am 24.07.16 um 14:32 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: >> >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product >>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this >>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could >>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could >>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to >>> help that are trusted by the PMC. >>> >>> Please vote, >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move >>> all >>> the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on >>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the >>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to >>> resolve >>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz >>> PMC. >>> >>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for >>> vulnerability handling. >>> >>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ >>> >>> >> >> > > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1
On 24/07/2016 14:32, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to help that are trusted by the PMC. Please vote, +1 to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for vulnerability handling. [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1
Thanks Sharan On 24/07/16 14:32, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Mmm... I must also add that ASF members have access to other PMCs private MLs
Jacques Le 24/07/2016 à 14:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Le 24/07/2016 à 14:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> Yes Michael. >> >> Le 24/07/2016 à 14:43, Michael Brohl a écrit : >>> The "private" mailing list is only for PMC members of the project? |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1
On 24/07/2016 14:32, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1
-- Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Systems - est. 1997 On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > |
Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just forward to
private@? Regards Scott On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < [hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > -- > Kind Regards > Ashish Vijaywargiya > HotWax Systems - est. 1997 > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > > > Please vote, > > > > +1 > > > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move > all > > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to > resolve > > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz > PMC. > > > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > > vulnerability handling. > > > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > > > |
+1
Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Scott Gray <[hidden email]> wrote: > Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just forward to > private@? > > Regards > Scott > > On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > Kind Regards > > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > HotWax Systems - est. 1997 > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > > > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > > > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it > could > > > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > > > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing > to > > > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > > > > > Please vote, > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move > > all > > > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening > on > > > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] > the > > > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to > > resolve > > > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz > > PMC. > > > > > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > > > vulnerability handling. > > > > > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1
Le 24/07/2016 à 14:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Scott Gray-3
I guess we need at least a separate list to grant access to non OFBiz-PMC/ASF members
Jacques Le 25/07/2016 à 06:38, Scott Gray a écrit : > Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just forward to > private@? > > Regards > Scott > > On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -- >> Kind Regards >> Ashish Vijaywargiya >> HotWax Systems - est. 1997 >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product >>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this >>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could >>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could >>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to >>> help that are trusted by the PMC. >>> >>> Please vote, >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move >> all >>> the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on >>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the >>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to >> resolve >>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz >> PMC. >>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for >>> vulnerability handling. >>> >>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ >>> |
Why would we do that? Security concerns are the responsibility of the PMC
and supposed to be kept confidential until resolved aren't they? On 25 July 2016 at 20:31, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > I guess we need at least a separate list to grant access to non > OFBiz-PMC/ASF members > > Jacques > > > > Le 25/07/2016 à 06:38, Scott Gray a écrit : > >> Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just forward to >> private@? >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> +1 >>> >>> -- >>> Kind Regards >>> Ashish Vijaywargiya >>> HotWax Systems - est. 1997 >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product >>>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this >>>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could >>>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could >>>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing >>>> to >>>> help that are trusted by the PMC. >>>> >>>> Please vote, >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move >>>> >>> all >>> >>>> the security related discussions and notifications currently happening >>>> on >>>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the >>>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to >>>> >>> resolve >>> >>>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz >>>> >>> PMC. >>> >>>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for >>>> vulnerability handling. >>>> >>>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ >>>> >>>> > |
On my side I voted +1 as I thing it would be easier for me to follow
security topics with a dedicated list. Furthermore, I don't need to be added to the private list as I don't need/want to be part of strategy or main orientations discussions for Ofbiz. 2016-07-25 11:27 GMT+02:00 Scott Gray <[hidden email]>: > Why would we do that? Security concerns are the responsibility of the PMC > and supposed to be kept confidential until resolved aren't they? > > On 25 July 2016 at 20:31, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > I guess we need at least a separate list to grant access to non > > OFBiz-PMC/ASF members > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > Le 25/07/2016 à 06:38, Scott Gray a écrit : > > > >> Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just forward > to > >> private@? > >> > >> Regards > >> Scott > >> > >> On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < > >> [hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kind Regards > >>> Ashish Vijaywargiya > >>> HotWax Systems - est. 1997 > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > >>> [hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > >>>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > >>>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it > could > >>>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > >>>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing > >>>> to > >>>> help that are trusted by the PMC. > >>>> > >>>> Please vote, > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move > >>>> > >>> all > >>> > >>>> the security related discussions and notifications currently happening > >>>> on > >>>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] > the > >>>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to > >>>> > >>> resolve > >>> > >>>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz > >>>> > >>> PMC. > >>> > >>>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > >>>> vulnerability handling. > >>>> > >>>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > >>>> > >>>> > > > -- Grégory Draperi |
Ok I had a read of http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html and I see
how it works. Looks like PMC is the default alternative "security team" when a security list doesn't exist. On 25 July 2016 at 21:31, gregory draperi <[hidden email]> wrote: > On my side I voted +1 as I thing it would be easier for me to follow > security topics with a dedicated list. > Furthermore, I don't need to be added to the private list as I don't > need/want to be part of strategy or main orientations discussions for > Ofbiz. > > > 2016-07-25 11:27 GMT+02:00 Scott Gray <[hidden email]>: > > > Why would we do that? Security concerns are the responsibility of the > PMC > > and supposed to be kept confidential until resolved aren't they? > > > > On 25 July 2016 at 20:31, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > I guess we need at least a separate list to grant access to non > > > OFBiz-PMC/ASF members > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 25/07/2016 à 06:38, Scott Gray a écrit : > > > > > >> Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just forward > > to > > >> private@? > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> Scott > > >> > > >> On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < > > >> [hidden email]> wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Kind Regards > > >>> Ashish Vijaywargiya > > >>> HotWax Systems - est. 1997 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > >>> [hidden email]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > > >>>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > > >>>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it > > could > > >>>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and > could > > >>>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons > willing > > >>>> to > > >>>> help that are trusted by the PMC. > > >>>> > > >>>> Please vote, > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and > move > > >>>> > > >>> all > > >>> > > >>>> the security related discussions and notifications currently > happening > > >>>> on > > >>>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] > > the > > >>>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to > > >>>> > > >>> resolve > > >>> > > >>>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the > OFBiz > > >>>> > > >>> PMC. > > >>> > > >>>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > > >>>> vulnerability handling. > > >>>> > > >>>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > -- > Grégory Draperi > |
Correct!
A project can ask for the creation of the security list and the PMC may invite non-PMC members. Jacopo On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Scott Gray <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ok I had a read of http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html and I > see > how it works. Looks like PMC is the default alternative "security team" > when a security list doesn't exist. > > On 25 July 2016 at 21:31, gregory draperi <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > On my side I voted +1 as I thing it would be easier for me to follow > > security topics with a dedicated list. > > Furthermore, I don't need to be added to the private list as I don't > > need/want to be part of strategy or main orientations discussions for > > Ofbiz. > > > > > > 2016-07-25 11:27 GMT+02:00 Scott Gray <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Why would we do that? Security concerns are the responsibility of the > > PMC > > > and supposed to be kept confidential until resolved aren't they? > > > > > > On 25 July 2016 at 20:31, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I guess we need at least a separate list to grant access to non > > > > OFBiz-PMC/ASF members > > > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 25/07/2016 à 06:38, Scott Gray a écrit : > > > > > > > >> Do we actually need a separate mailing list, or should it just > forward > > > to > > > >> private@? > > > >> > > > >> Regards > > > >> Scott > > > >> > > > >> On 25 July 2016 at 15:58, Ashish Vijaywargiya < > > > >> [hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Kind Regards > > > >>> Ashish Vijaywargiya > > > >>> HotWax Systems - est. 1997 > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > > >>> [hidden email]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss > product > > > >>>> vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for > this > > > >>>> purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it > > > could > > > >>>> provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and > > could > > > >>>> provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons > > willing > > > >>>> to > > > >>>> help that are trusted by the PMC. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Please vote, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> +1 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and > > move > > > >>>> > > > >>> all > > > >>> > > > >>>> the security related discussions and notifications currently > > happening > > > >>>> on > > > >>>> the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies > [*] > > > the > > > >>>> list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to > > > >>>> > > > >>> resolve > > > >>> > > > >>>> security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the > > OFBiz > > > >>>> > > > >>> PMC. > > > >>> > > > >>>> Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list > for > > > >>>> vulnerability handling. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Grégory Draperi > > > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
+1 -David > On 24 Jul 2016, at 05:32, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Rationale: every ASF project needs a private list to discuss product > vulnerabilities; for OFBiz the "private" list has been used for this > purpose until now; however an ad-hoc list may be useful because it could > provide a more focused space to discuss the security issues and could > provide more flexibility to invite in the private list persons willing to > help that are trusted by the PMC. > > Please vote, > > +1 > > to create a "security" list (i.e. [hidden email]) and move all > the security related discussions and notifications currently happening on > the private list to this new list: according to the ASF policies [*] the > list will be a private list used by the persons willing to help to resolve > security issues; the list of subscribers will be approved by the OFBiz PMC. > > Otherwise vote -1 to continue to use the "private" mailing list for > vulnerability handling. > > [*] http://www.apache.org/security/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |