According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: ant download-selenium This returns the following error: Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main Build". for Release 9.04 version 899857 Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857? Regards, Ruth |
Hi Ruth,
I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > According to the documentation, I should be able to download the necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: > > ant download-selenium > > This returns the following error: > > Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main Build". > > for Release 9.04 version 899857 > > Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857? > > Regards, > Ruth smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Hi Scott:
Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. Next question: should it? Or should the documentation be amended to reflect this? Regards, Ruth Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Ruth, > > I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase > > Regards > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > > >> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >> >> ant download-selenium >> >> This returns the following error: >> >> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main Build". >> >> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >> >> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857? >> >> Regards, >> Ruth >> > > |
Comments inline:
Thanks! -- Ashish On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Scott: > Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. > Next question: should it? I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. >>Or should the documentation be amended to reflect > this? Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported in trunk would make others life easy IMO. > Regards, > Ruth > > Scott Gray wrote: >> >> Hi Ruth, >> >> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >> Regards >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> >> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> >>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>> >>> ant download-selenium >>> >>> This returns the following error: >>> >>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>> Build". >>> >>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>> >>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>> 899857? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >> >> > |
Hi Ashish:
If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? What bug fix drove this change? [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.] Regards, Ruth Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > Comments inline: > Thanks! > > -- > Ashish > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Scott: >> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. >> Next question: should it? >> > > I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes > were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. > > >>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect >>> >> this? >> > > Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported > in trunk would make others life easy IMO. > > >> Regards, >> Ruth >> >> Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> Hi Ruth, >>> >>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> >>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>>> >>>> ant download-selenium >>>> >>>> This returns the following error: >>>> >>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>>> Build". >>>> >>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>>> >>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>>> 899857? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ruth >>>> >>>> >>> > > |
On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Ashish: > If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? It does? Since when? > What bug fix drove this change? > [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.] > Regards, > Ruth > > Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >> Comments inline: >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Ashish >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Scott: >>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. >>> Next question: should it? >>> >> >> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes >> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. >> >> >>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect >>>> >>> this? >>> >> >> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported >> in trunk would make others life easy IMO. >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ruth, >>>> >>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>>>> >>>>> ant download-selenium >>>>> >>>>> This returns the following error: >>>>> >>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>>>> Build". >>>>> >>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>>>> >>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>>>> 899857? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ruth >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Hi Scott:
Read it and weep :-) http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features Scott Gray wrote: > On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > > >> Hi Ashish: >> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? >> > > It does? Since when? > > >> What bug fix drove this change? >> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.] >> Regards, >> Ruth >> >> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >> >>> Comments inline: >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Ashish >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Scott: >>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. >>>> Next question: should it? >>>> >>>> >>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes >>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect >>>>> >>>>> >>>> this? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported >>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ruth >>>> >>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Ruth, >>>>> >>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >>>>> Regards >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> HotWax Media >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>>>>> >>>>>> ant download-selenium >>>>>> >>>>>> This returns the following error: >>>>>> >>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>>>>> Build". >>>>>> >>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>>>>> 899857? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Ruth >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > > |
Read what? The main new features page refers to what is going on in the trunk and has no bearing on the release branches after their creation. The release branches don't receive new features, only bug fixes.
Regards Scott On 27/01/2010, at 7:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Scott: > > Read it and weep :-) > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features > > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Ashish: >>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? >>> >> >> It does? Since when? >> >> >>> What bug fix drove this change? >>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.] >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>> >>>> Comments inline: >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ashish >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Scott: >>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. >>>>> Next question: should it? >>>>> >>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes >>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect >>>>>> >>>>> this? >>>>> >>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported >>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ruth >>>>> >>>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ruth, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ant download-selenium >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This returns the following error: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>>>>>> Build". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>>>>>> 899857? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> >> smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Hi Scott:
Actually, no where on that page does it say "trunk". What it does say is "...approximately to changes since Release 4.0..." which could potentially lead new users - looking for more information about various release contents - to assume that these changes apply to OFBiz releases. So, I'm back to my original question concerning whether or not Selenium support is in 9.04. I was told to read this document and everything it pointed to. I did. And...I made some incorrect assumptions. I made the original request on the User's mailing list. I'm a user and not a committer. How am I suppose to know that this document refers to trunk commits if that is not clearly stated on the document? BTW, I'm not faulting Hans. Thank you Hans for helping me. Regards, Ruth ---------------------------------------------------- Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" [hidden email] Scott Gray wrote: > Read what? The main new features page refers to what is going on in the trunk and has no bearing on the release branches after their creation. The release branches don't receive new features, only bug fixes. > > Regards > Scott > > On 27/01/2010, at 7:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > > >> Hi Scott: >> >> Read it and weep :-) >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features >> >> Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Ashish: >>>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? >>>> >>>> >>> It does? Since when? >>> >>> >>> >>>> What bug fix drove this change? >>>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.] >>>> Regards, >>>> Ruth >>>> >>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Comments inline: >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ashish >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Scott: >>>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. >>>>>> Next question: should it? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes >>>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported >>>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Ruth >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Ruth, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Scott >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ant download-selenium >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This returns the following error: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>>>>>>> Build". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>>>>>>> 899857? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > > |
Hi Ruth
Yes I can understand how it might lead to confusion, the bottom line is that the release branches receive only bug fixes and nothing else. I think Hans was pointing you to that document to show that Selenium was listed as being introduced after the creation of the 9.04 branch and hence the feature isn't available to it. I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any confusion. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 27/01/2010, at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Scott: > Actually, no where on that page does it say "trunk". What it does say is "...approximately to changes since Release 4.0..." which could potentially lead new users - looking for more information about various release contents - to assume that these changes apply to OFBiz releases. > > So, I'm back to my original question concerning whether or not Selenium support is in 9.04. I was told to read this document and everything it pointed to. I did. And...I made some incorrect assumptions. > > I made the original request on the User's mailing list. I'm a user and not a committer. How am I suppose to know that this document refers to trunk commits if that is not clearly stated on the document? > > BTW, I'm not faulting Hans. Thank you Hans for helping me. > > Regards, > Ruth > ---------------------------------------------------- > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > [hidden email] > Scott Gray wrote: >> Read what? The main new features page refers to what is going on in the trunk and has no bearing on the release branches after their creation. The release branches don't receive new features, only bug fixes. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 27/01/2010, at 7:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Scott: >>> >>> Read it and weep :-) >>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features >>> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Ashish: >>>>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? >>>>> >>>> It does? Since when? >>>> >>>> >>>>> What bug fix drove this change? >>>>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.] >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ruth >>>>> >>>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Comments inline: >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ashish >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Scott: >>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question. >>>>>>> Next question: should it? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes >>>>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> this? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported >>>>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Ruth, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Scott >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the >>>>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ant download-selenium >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This returns the following error: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main >>>>>>>>> Build". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version >>>>>>>>> 899857? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> >> smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any confusion. +1 Jacques Regards Scott |
Done.
Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit. Regards, Ruth Jacques Le Roux wrote: > From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> > I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add > whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any > confusion. > > +1 > Jacques > > Regards > Scott > > > |
Administrator
|
Hi Ruth,
I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only my paranonia ;o). I much more clear, thanks! Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[hidden email]> > Done. > Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit. > Regards, > Ruth > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users >> avoid any confusion. >> >> +1 >> Jacques >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> >> > |
I changed the title back so that it doesn't break any existing links in the mail archives.
Regards Scott On 27/01/2010, at 3:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Ruth, > > I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only my paranonia ;o). > I much more clear, thanks! > > Jacques > > From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[hidden email]> >> Done. >> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit. >> Regards, >> Ruth >> >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any confusion. >>> >>> +1 >>> Jacques >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> >>> > > smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> Hi Ruth, > > I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe > it's only my paranonia ;o). > I much more clear, thanks! Typo : It's much more clear, thanks! Jacques > Jacques > > From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[hidden email]> >> Done. >> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit. >> Regards, >> Ruth >> >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users >>> avoid any confusion. >>> >>> +1 >>> Jacques >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> >>> >> > > |
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacques:
I mean "greatest". It is the greatest! Just because I'm always complaining about things doesn't mean I don't think its great. All these contributions are really wonderful to see. Ruth Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Ruth, > > I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to > put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only > my paranonia ;o). > I much more clear, thanks! > > Jacques > > From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[hidden email]> >> Done. >> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit. >> Regards, >> Ruth >> >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add >>> whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any >>> confusion. >>> >>> +1 >>> Jacques >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> >>> >> > > > |
Administrator
|
It was a bit a troll ;o)
Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[hidden email]> > Hi Jacques: > I mean "greatest". It is the greatest! Just because I'm always > complaining about things doesn't mean I don't think its great. All these > contributions are really wonderful to see. > Ruth > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> Hi Ruth, >> >> I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to >> put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only >> my paranonia ;o). >> I much more clear, thanks! >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[hidden email]> >>> Done. >>> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit. >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >>>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add >>>> whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any >>>> confusion. >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |