birt component without duplicates : objection against merging?

[Hans Bakker]

Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem.

concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be
more roman catholic than the pope......

so what is the community opinion?

can we merge the addbirt branch back into the trunk?

Regards,
Hans

--
http://www.antwebsystems.com :
Quality OFBiz support for competitive rates....

[Adam Heath-2]

Hans Bakker wrote:
> concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
> foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be
> more roman catholic than the pope......

No.  You can't just blindly relicense something.  That's the whole
point of it being a license.  And if *all* those embedded jars are
EPL, then I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that there are some libs
that can *not* be relicensed.

> so what is the community opinion?

-1, tentively

> can we merge the addbirt branch back into the trunk?

I'd like to take the weekend to look this over.  Here in the United
States, it's a major holiday tomorrow, and most people have a 4 day
weekend.  Plus, some might be travelling today.

[Scott Gray-2]

On 26/11/2009, at 1:29 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

> Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem.
>
> concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
> foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be
> more roman catholic than the pope......

What on Earth are you talking about?  Have you actually bothered to  
read any of the emails I've sent?
Do not ask me to review anything again, I spent a good amount of time  
looking at the component only to be ignored.

Regards
Scott

>
> so what is the community opinion?
-1

[Tim Ruppert]

-1 until the licensing and other issues are resolved.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Scott Gray wrote:

> On 26/11/2009, at 1:29 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>
>> Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem.
>>
>> concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
>> foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not  
>> be
>> more roman catholic than the pope......
>
> What on Earth are you talking about?  Have you actually bothered to  
> read any of the emails I've sent?
> Do not ask me to review anything again, I spent a good amount of  
> time looking at the component only to be ignored.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
>>
>> so what is the community opinion?
> -1
>