OFBiz › OFBiz - Dev

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 6 messages Options
buildbot
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2460

Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/

Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu

Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1226223
Blamelist: jleroux

BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot



Jacques Le Roux
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
It's only 4 BigDecimal comparaisons issues in tests, I'm looking at it...

Jacques

From: <[hidden email]>

> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2460
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>
> Build Reason: scheduler
> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1226223
> Blamelist: jleroux
>
> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>
> sincerely,
> -The Buildbot
>
>
>
>
Jacopo Cappellato-4
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Jacopo Cappellato-4
Hi Jacques,

the failure could be related to the year switch... this happens every year and it needs some updates to demo fiscal periods to fix; or you could try with a patch like:

Index: applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml
===================================================================
--- applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (revision 1226294)
+++ applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (working copy)
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6012" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-04-01" thruDate="2010-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2010/Q2" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6013" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-07-01" thruDate="2010-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2010/Q3" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6014" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-10-01" thruDate="2011-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="5" periodName="2010/Q4" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
-    <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2012-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
+    <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2020-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6016" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2011-04-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="2" periodName="2011/Q1" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6017" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-04-01" thruDate="2011-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2011/Q2" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6018" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-07-01" thruDate="2011-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2011/Q3" parentPeriodId="6015"/>


that should fix the issue once for all... but I didn't test it yet and so there may be other changes required; but if you are looking into the issue it may be useful, if not I will review the issue tomorrow.

Kind regards

Jacopo



On Jan 1, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> It's only 4 BigDecimal comparaisons issues in tests, I'm looking at it...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: <[hidden email]>
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2460
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>> Build Reason: scheduler
>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1226223
>> Blamelist: jleroux
>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>> sincerely,
>> -The Buildbot
>>

Adrian Crum-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Adrian Crum-3
The ability to use expressions in seed/demo data would be a nice feature.

-Adrian

On 1/1/2012 7:59 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> Hi Jacques,
>
> the failure could be related to the year switch... this happens every year and it needs some updates to demo fiscal periods to fix; or you could try with a patch like:
>
> Index: applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (revision 1226294)
> +++ applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (working copy)
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6012" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-04-01" thruDate="2010-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2010/Q2" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6013" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-07-01" thruDate="2010-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2010/Q3" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6014" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-10-01" thruDate="2011-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="5" periodName="2010/Q4" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
> -<CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2012-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
> +<CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2020-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6016" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2011-04-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="2" periodName="2011/Q1" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6017" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-04-01" thruDate="2011-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2011/Q2" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6018" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-07-01" thruDate="2011-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2011/Q3" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>
>
> that should fix the issue once for all... but I didn't test it yet and so there may be other changes required; but if you are looking into the issue it may be useful, if not I will review the issue tomorrow.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jacopo
>
>
>
> On Jan 1, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> It's only 4 BigDecimal comparaisons issues in tests, I'm looking at it...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From:<[hidden email]>
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2460
>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>> Build Reason: scheduler
>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1226223
>>> Blamelist: jleroux
>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>>> sincerely,
>>> -The Buildbot
>>>
Jacques Le Roux
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
Thanks Jacopo,

It's a real relief for me, because I did not see any relation with my commit ;o)

I'm trying your change, as Adrian suggested having expression here could be an even better solution (2020 will come soon ;o). Of
course not the same magnitude of work...

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> Hi Jacques,
>
> the failure could be related to the year switch... this happens every year and it needs some updates to demo fiscal periods to
> fix; or you could try with a patch like:
>
> Index: applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (revision 1226294)
> +++ applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (working copy)
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
>     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6012" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-04-01"
> thruDate="2010-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2010/Q2" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6013" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-07-01"
> thruDate="2010-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2010/Q3" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6014" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2010-10-01"
> thruDate="2011-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="5" periodName="2010/Q4" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
> -    <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01"
> thruDate="2012-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
> +    <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01"
> thruDate="2020-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
>     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6016" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-01-01"
> thruDate="2011-04-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="2" periodName="2011/Q1" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6017" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-04-01"
> thruDate="2011-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2011/Q2" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>     <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6018" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER" fromDate="2011-07-01"
> thruDate="2011-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2011/Q3" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>
>
> that should fix the issue once for all... but I didn't test it yet and so there may be other changes required; but if you are
> looking into the issue it may be useful, if not I will review the issue tomorrow.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jacopo
>
>
>
> On Jan 1, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> It's only 4 BigDecimal comparaisons issues in tests, I'm looking at it...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: <[hidden email]>
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2460
>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>> Build Reason: scheduler
>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1226223
>>> Blamelist: jleroux
>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>>> sincerely,
>>> -The Buildbot
>>>
>
>
Jacques Le Roux
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Adrian Crum-3
> The ability to use expressions in seed/demo data would be a nice feature.

+1 !

Jacques

> -Adrian
>
> On 1/1/2012 7:59 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> the failure could be related to the year switch... this happens every year and it needs some updates to demo fiscal periods to
>> fix; or you could try with a patch like:
>>
>> Index: applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (revision 1226294)
>> +++ applications/accounting/data/DemoGlSetupData.xml (working copy)
>> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
>>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6012" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER"
>> fromDate="2010-04-01" thruDate="2010-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2010/Q2" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6013" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER"
>> fromDate="2010-07-01" thruDate="2010-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2010/Q3" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6014" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER"
>> fromDate="2010-10-01" thruDate="2011-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="5" periodName="2010/Q4" parentPeriodId="6010"/>
>> -<CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01"
>> thruDate="2012-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
>> +<CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6015" periodTypeId="FISCAL_YEAR" fromDate="2011-01-01"
>> thruDate="2020-01-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="1" periodName="2011"/>
>>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6016" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER"
>> fromDate="2011-01-01" thruDate="2011-04-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="2" periodName="2011/Q1" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6017" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER"
>> fromDate="2011-04-01" thruDate="2011-07-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="3" periodName="2011/Q2" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>>       <CustomTimePeriod organizationPartyId="Company" customTimePeriodId="6018" periodTypeId="FISCAL_QUARTER"
>> fromDate="2011-07-01" thruDate="2011-10-01" isClosed="N" periodNum="4" periodName="2011/Q3" parentPeriodId="6015"/>
>>
>>
>> that should fix the issue once for all... but I didn't test it yet and so there may be other changes required; but if you are
>> looking into the issue it may be useful, if not I will review the issue tomorrow.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> It's only 4 BigDecimal comparaisons issues in tests, I'm looking at it...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From:<[hidden email]>
>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2460
>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>>> Build Reason: scheduler
>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1226223
>>>> Blamelist: jleroux
>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>>>> sincerely,
>>>> -The Buildbot
>>>>
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page