buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
Locked
 
|
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 sincerely, -The Buildbot |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
Administrator
|
I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar
I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not triggered on removed libs. We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by BuildBot... Jacques From: <[hidden email]> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. > Full details are available at: > http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 > > Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ > > Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 > Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp > > BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > > > |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo tomorrow
morning... Until Sascha has fixed it... Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar > I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment > > Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not triggered on removed libs. > We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by BuildBot... > > Jacques > > From: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. >> Full details are available at: >> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >> >> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >> >> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >> >> Build Reason: scheduler >> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >> >> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >> >> sincerely, >> -The Buildbot >> >> >> |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
Done (should be ok soon), I changed
check-svn-update.sh trunk-manual.sh and restarted trunk Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo > tomorrow morning... Until Sascha has fixed it... > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment >> >> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not triggered on removed libs. >> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by BuildBot... >> >> Jacques >> >> From: <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. >>> Full details are available at: >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>> >>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>> >>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>> >>> Build Reason: scheduler >>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>> >>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>> >>> sincerely, >>> -The Buildbot >>> >>> >>> |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
|
Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange
that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>: > Done (should be ok soon), I changed > check-svn-update.sh > trunk-manual.sh > and restarted trunk > > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> >> From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will >> certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo tomorrow morning... Until >> Sascha has fixed it... >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> >>> I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >>> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment >>> >>> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not >>> triggered on removed libs. >>> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by >>> BuildBot... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: <[hidden email]> >>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>>> >>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while >>>> building ASF Buildbot. >>>> Full details are available at: >>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>>> >>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>> >>>> Build Reason: scheduler >>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>>> >>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>> >>>> sincerely, >>>> -The Buildbot >>>> >>>> >>>> > -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Le 16/01/2012 11:24, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
> Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange > that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate > lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy > ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. > tika is duplicated too (already existing in applications/content/lib) Regards, -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
|
yes, i think we could move the tika 1.0 version to the JCR package, i
testing that already. What do you think of centralizing the lucene implementation? 2012/1/16 Erwan de FERRIERES <[hidden email]>: > Le 16/01/2012 11:24, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : > >> Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange >> that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate >> lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy >> ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. >> > > tika is duplicated too (already existing in applications/content/lib) > > Regards, > > -- > Erwan de FERRIERES > www.nereide.biz -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
In reply to this post by Sascha Rodekamp-3
looks like these tests are still failing...
>>> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex//summary')> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex/> 0.63 sec 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> >>> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand//summary')> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand/> 2 ms 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> >>> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex_2//summary')> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex_2/> 0.63 sec 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> >>> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand_2//summary')> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand_2/> regards, Hans On 01/16/2012 05:24 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: > Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange > that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate > lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy > ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. > > 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux<[hidden email]>: >> Done (should be ok soon), I changed >> check-svn-update.sh >> trunk-manual.sh >> and restarted trunk >> >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux"<[hidden email]> >>> From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will >>> certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo tomorrow morning... Until >>> Sascha has fixed it... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux"<[hidden email]> >>>> I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >>>> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment >>>> >>>> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not >>>> triggered on removed libs. >>>> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by >>>> BuildBot... >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From:<[hidden email]> >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while >>>>> building ASF Buildbot. >>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>>>> >>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>> >>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> Build Reason: scheduler >>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>>>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>>>> >>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>> >>>>> sincerely, >>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
Here at r1231902, I see only
baseteststestReadWriteObjectFailurewrite stream java.lang.Boolean expected:<......> but was:<... ...> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: write stream java.lang.Boolean expected:<......> but was:<... ...> at org.ofbiz.base.test.GenericTestCaseBase.assertEquals(GenericTestCaseBase.java:313) at org.ofbiz.base.util.test.UtilIOTests.checkBasicReadWriteObject(UtilIOTests.java:147) at org.ofbiz.base.util.test.UtilIOTests.testReadWriteObject(UtilIOTests.java:155) at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:230) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:310) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:289) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:119) 0.016 facilitytestsinventory-tests.testGetInventoryAvailableByFacilityFailureAssertion failed: [quantityOnHandTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Assertion failed: [quantityOnHandTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal at org.ofbiz.testtools.SimpleMethodTest.run(SimpleMethodTest.java:100) at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:230) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:310) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:289) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:119) Assertion failed: [availableToPromiseTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Assertion failed: [availableToPromiseTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal at org.ofbiz.testtools.SimpleMethodTest.run(SimpleMethodTest.java:100) at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:230) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:310) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:289) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:119) The 1st error is known on Windows (still working on it...) I don't think the 2d is related to JackRabbit integration... HTH Jacques From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> > looks like these tests are still failing... > >>> > <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex//summary')> > org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex > <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex/> > 0.63 sec 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> > >>> > <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand//summary')> > org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand > <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand/> > 2 ms 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> > >>> > <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex_2//summary')> > org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex > <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex_2/> > 0.63 sec 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> > >>> > <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand_2//summary')> > org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand > <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand_2/> > > > > > regards, > Hans > > On 01/16/2012 05:24 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: >> Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange >> that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate >> lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy >> ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. >> >> 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux<[hidden email]>: >>> Done (should be ok soon), I changed >>> check-svn-update.sh >>> trunk-manual.sh >>> and restarted trunk >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux"<[hidden email]> >>>> From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will >>>> certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo tomorrow morning... Until >>>> Sascha has fixed it... >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux"<[hidden email]> >>>>> I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >>>>> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment >>>>> >>>>> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not >>>>> triggered on removed libs. >>>>> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by >>>>> BuildBot... >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From:<[hidden email]> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while >>>>>> building ASF Buildbot. >>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>>>>> >>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>> >>>>>> Build Reason: scheduler >>>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>>>>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>>>>> >>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>> >>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> > > |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Sascha Rodekamp-3
+1 to have a sole place for any third party implementation
Jacques From: "Sascha Rodekamp" <[hidden email]> > yes, i think we could move the tika 1.0 version to the JCR package, i > testing that already. > > What do you think of centralizing the lucene implementation? > > > 2012/1/16 Erwan de FERRIERES <[hidden email]>: >> Le 16/01/2012 11:24, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : >> >>> Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange >>> that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate >>> lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy >>> ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. >>> >> >> tika is duplicated too (already existing in applications/content/lib) >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Erwan de FERRIERES >> www.nereide.biz > > > > -- > > Sascha Rodekamp > Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz > Lynx-Consulting GmbH > Johanniskirchplatz 6 > D-33615 Bielefeld > http://www.lynx.de > |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Hey tried the lucene tests under rev1231646 (before the jackrabbit
commit). They also fail. so think that's not related to JCR. 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>: > Here at r1231902, I see only > > baseteststestReadWriteObjectFailurewrite stream java.lang.Boolean > expected:<......> but was:<... ...> > > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: write stream java.lang.Boolean > expected:<......> but was:<... > ...> > at > org.ofbiz.base.test.GenericTestCaseBase.assertEquals(GenericTestCaseBase.java:313) > at > org.ofbiz.base.util.test.UtilIOTests.checkBasicReadWriteObject(UtilIOTests.java:147) > at > org.ofbiz.base.util.test.UtilIOTests.testReadWriteObject(UtilIOTests.java:155) > at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) > at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:230) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:310) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:289) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:119) > 0.016 > facilitytestsinventory-tests.testGetInventoryAvailableByFacilityFailureAssertion > failed: [quantityOnHandTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal > > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Assertion failed: > [quantityOnHandTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal > at org.ofbiz.testtools.SimpleMethodTest.run(SimpleMethodTest.java:100) > at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) > at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:230) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:310) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:289) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:119) > Assertion failed: [availableToPromiseTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal > > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Assertion failed: > [availableToPromiseTotal=507] equals 509 as BigDecimal > at org.ofbiz.testtools.SimpleMethodTest.run(SimpleMethodTest.java:100) > at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) > at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:230) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:310) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:289) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:119) > > The 1st error is known on Windows (still working on it...) > I don't think the 2d is related to JackRabbit integration... > > HTH > > Jacques > > From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> >> >> looks like these tests are still failing... >> >>> >> >> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex//summary')> >> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex >> >> <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex/> >> 0.63 sec 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> >> >>> >> >> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand//summary')> >> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand >> >> <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand/> >> 2 ms 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> >> >>> >> >> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex_2//summary')> >> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testCreateIndex >> >> <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testCreateIndex_2/> >> 0.63 sec 1 <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/> >> >>> >> >> <javascript:showStackTrace('test-org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand','org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand_2//summary')> >> org.ofbiz.content.test.LuceneTests.testSearchTermHand >> >> <http://jenkins.antwebsystems.com/job/OFBizTrunk/15/testReport/org.ofbiz.content.test/LuceneTests/testSearchTermHand_2/> >> >> >> >> >> >> regards, >> Hans >> >> On 01/16/2012 05:24 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: >>> >>> Ok it is fixed. Seems that the lucene 3.5 breaks Jackrabbit. Strange >>> that this doesn't occur in the branch. Anyway JCR uses now a separate >>> lucene 3.0.3. I'll check what to do that we can remove the redundancy >>> ASAP and make Jackrabbit able to use Lucene 3.5. >>> >>> 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux<[hidden email]>: >>>> >>>> Done (should be ok soon), I changed >>>> check-svn-update.sh >>>> trunk-manual.sh >>>> and restarted trunk >>>> >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux"<[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>> From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I >>>>> will >>>>> certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo tomorrow morning... >>>>> Until >>>>> Sascha has fixed it... >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux"<[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >>>>>> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit >>>>>> comment >>>>>> >>>>>> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not >>>>>> triggered on removed libs. >>>>>> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by >>>>>> BuildBot... >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From:<[hidden email]> >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while >>>>>>> building ASF Buildbot. >>>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Build Reason: scheduler >>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>>>>>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
|
Le 16/01/2012 14:42, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
> Hey tried the lucene tests under rev1231646 (before the jackrabbit > commit). They also fail. > so think that's not related to JCR. > Hi Sascha, lucene tests are running well, see http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2510 Tasks is compile_1 Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
Also, as stated before, I did not get any issues with Lucene tests locally running
ant run-install run-test Jacques From: "Erwan de FERRIERES" <[hidden email]> > Le 16/01/2012 14:42, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : >> Hey tried the lucene tests under rev1231646 (before the jackrabbit >> commit). They also fail. >> so think that's not related to JCR. >> > Hi Sascha, > > lucene tests are running well, see http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2510 > > Tasks is compile_1 > > Cheers, > > > -- > Erwan de FERRIERES > www.nereide.biz |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
|
Hi,
ok there is a problem with the two different lucene versions. I removed the version 3.0.3 and disable the jackrabbit searchIndex. That means for now we aren't able to search in the repository. Jackrabbit doesn't support lucene 3.5 yet. 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>: > Also, as stated before, I did not get any issues with Lucene tests locally > running > ant run-install run-test > > Jacques > > From: "Erwan de FERRIERES" <[hidden email]> > >> Le 16/01/2012 14:42, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : >>> >>> Hey tried the lucene tests under rev1231646 (before the jackrabbit >>> commit). They also fail. >>> so think that's not related to JCR. >>> >> Hi Sascha, >> >> lucene tests are running well, see >> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2510 >> >> Tasks is compile_1 >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> -- >> Erwan de FERRIERES >> www.nereide.biz -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
|
Thank you sacha, tests are now running fine again.....
On 01/17/2012 02:11 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: > Hi, > ok there is a problem with the two different lucene versions. I > removed the version 3.0.3 and disable the jackrabbit searchIndex. > > That means for now we aren't able to search in the repository. > Jackrabbit doesn't support lucene 3.5 yet. > > > 2012/1/16 Jacques Le Roux<[hidden email]>: >> Also, as stated before, I did not get any issues with Lucene tests locally >> running >> ant run-install run-test >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Erwan de FERRIERES"<[hidden email]> >> >>> Le 16/01/2012 14:42, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : >>>> Hey tried the lucene tests under rev1231646 (before the jackrabbit >>>> commit). They also fail. >>>> so think that's not related to JCR. >>>> >>> Hi Sascha, >>> >>> lucene tests are running well, see >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2510 >>> >>> Tasks is compile_1 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>> www.nereide.biz > > |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
It's ok now, so I reverted changes below, it updates again to HEAD
But we have still # temporary change until we fix the theme issue svn merge -c -1202849 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk I think it's ok now, I will check that tomorrow... Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > Done (should be ok soon), I changed > check-svn-update.sh > trunk-manual.sh > and restarted trunk > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo >> tomorrow morning... Until Sascha has fixed it... >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >>> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment >>> >>> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not triggered on removed libs. >>> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by BuildBot... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: <[hidden email]> >>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. >>>> Full details are available at: >>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>>> >>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>> >>>> Build Reason: scheduler >>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>>> >>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>> >>>> sincerely, >>>> -The Buildbot >>>> >>>> >>>> |
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
|
Administrator
|
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> It's ok now, so I reverted changes below, it updates again to HEAD > > But we have still > > # temporary change until we fix the theme issue > svn merge -c -1202849 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk > I think it's ok now, I will check that tomorrow... This is solved now, I removed the temporary change Jacques > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> Done (should be ok soon), I changed >> check-svn-update.sh >> trunk-manual.sh >> and restarted trunk >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> From a report in user ML, seems that it's a bit more complicated. I will certainly force "svn up -r 1231646" in trunk demo >>> tomorrow morning... Until Sascha has fixed it... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>I think it was because of framework/base/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar >>>> I guess blamelist was done because of me also updating a commit comment >>>> >>>> Sascha at r1231656 should have fixed that. BuildBot apparently is not triggered on removed libs. >>>> We will see if I'm right at the next changes taken in account by BuildBot... >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: <[hidden email]> >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:37 PM >>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. >>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2520 >>>>> >>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>> >>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> Build Reason: scheduler >>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1231649 >>>>> Blamelist: jleroux,sascharodekamp >>>>> >>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>> >>>>> sincerely, >>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |