The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 sincerely, -The Buildbot |
I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data
changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you fix it :-) Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF > Buildbot. > Full details are available at: > http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 > > Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ > > Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu > > Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: > testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 > Build Source Stamp: HEAD > Blamelist: > > BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment |
Link for our interest: http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show=ofbiz-trunk
-- Ashish On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Scott Gray <[hidden email]>wrote: > I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data changes > yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them fixed up > tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you fix it :-) > > Regards > Scott > > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > > The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. >> Full details are available at: >> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >> >> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >> >> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >> >> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: testing >> new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >> Blamelist: >> >> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >> >> sincerely, >> -The Buildbot >> >> > |
In reply to this post by Scott Gray-2
On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you fix it :-) > I could try to say that I was just testing the new build notification mechanism :-) Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. Jacopo > Regards > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > >> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. >> Full details are available at: >> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >> >> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >> >> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >> >> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >> Blamelist: >> >> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >> >> sincerely, >> -The Buildbot >> > |
I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a bug
that Jacques introduced this morning :-) Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a couple of days since I was working on those tests. Regards Scott On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data >> changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get >> them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you >> break it you fix it :-) >> > > I could try to say that I was just testing the new build > notification mechanism :-) > Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. > > Jacopo > > >> Regards >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >> >>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF >>> Buildbot. >>> Full details are available at: >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>> >>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>> >>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>> >>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: >>> testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>> Blamelist: >>> >>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>> >>> sincerely, >>> -The Buildbot >>> >> > smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment |
Ok,
I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as "failure" (I don't think it is related to the work I did on accounting data): <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13>" type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> at org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java:81) at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:100) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) </failure> </testcase> Regards, Jacopo On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a bug that Jacques introduced this morning :-) > > Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a couple of days since I was working on those tests. > > Regards > Scott > > On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you fix it :-) >>> >> >> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build notification mechanism :-) >> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>> >>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. >>>> Full details are available at: >>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>> >>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>> >>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>> Blamelist: >>>> >>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>> >>>> sincerely, >>>> -The Buildbot >>>> >>> >> > |
Thanks Jacopo, your revision is compiling now on buildbot, the
suspense is killing me :-) I know about the entity test failing, it shouldn't affect buildbot though because that test only fails after the first run. It's a problem with the test delegator not catching some async service entity operations so som records are left over from previous test runs. I think that is caused by the JobManager being instantiated with a normal delegator during startup so no entity operations performed by it are caught by the test suite delegators. I've got a fix in mind but need to think about it a bit more. Thanks again Scott On 24/11/2009, at 11:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Ok, > > I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. > > BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as "failure" (I > don't think it is related to the work I did on accounting data): > > <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" > name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> > <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but > was:<13>" > type > = > "junit > .framework > .AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 4 > TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> > at > org > .ofbiz > .entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java:81) > at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java: > 146) > at > org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java: > 100) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) > at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) > </failure> > </testcase> > > Regards, > > Jacopo > > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a bug >> that Jacques introduced this morning :-) >> >> Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a >> couple of days since I was working on those tests. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some >>>> data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but >>>> I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your >>>> own, you break it you fix it :-) >>>> >>> >>> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build >>> notification mechanism :-) >>> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF >>>>> Buildbot. >>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>>> >>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>> >>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel >>>>> #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>>> Blamelist: >>>>> >>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>> >>>>> sincerely, >>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment |
Sorry Jacopo, it's still failing:
[JUNIT] Results for test suite: accountingtests [java] 2009-11-24 10:34:33,958 (main) [JUNIT] Pass: false | # Tests: 16 | # Failed: 14 # Errors: 0 Regards Scott On 24/11/2009, at 11:30 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > Thanks Jacopo, your revision is compiling now on buildbot, the > suspense is killing me :-) > > I know about the entity test failing, it shouldn't affect buildbot > though because that test only fails after the first run. It's a > problem with the test delegator not catching some async service > entity operations so som records are left over from previous test > runs. I think that is caused by the JobManager being instantiated > with a normal delegator during startup so no entity operations > performed by it are caught by the test suite delegators. I've got a > fix in mind but need to think about it a bit more. > > Thanks again > Scott > > On 24/11/2009, at 11:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> Ok, >> >> I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. >> >> BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as "failure" (I >> don't think it is related to the work I did on accounting data): >> >> <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" >> name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> >> <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but >> was:<13>" >> type >> = >> "junit >> .framework >> .AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 4 >> TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> >> at >> org >> .ofbiz >> .entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java:81) >> at >> org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) >> at >> org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java: >> 100) >> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) >> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) >> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) >> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) >> </failure> >> </testcase> >> >> Regards, >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a >>> bug that Jacques introduced this morning :-) >>> >>> Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a >>> couple of days since I was working on those tests. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> >>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>> >>>>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some >>>>> data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but >>>>> I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your >>>>> own, you break it you fix it :-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build >>>> notification mechanism :-) >>>> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> HotWax Media >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>> >>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF >>>>>> Buildbot. >>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>>>> >>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>> >>>>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel >>>>>> #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>>>> Blamelist: >>>>>> >>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>> >>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment |
Scott,
thank you for the tests and report, I am on it now and will fix it soon. I was confused by the fact that the errors were not logged under the test log files in runtime/logs folder... I will try to investigate this further. Jacopo On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > Sorry Jacopo, it's still failing: > [JUNIT] Results for test suite: accountingtests [java] 2009-11-24 10:34:33,958 (main) > [JUNIT] Pass: false | # Tests: 16 | # Failed: 14 # Errors: 0 > Regards > Scott > > On 24/11/2009, at 11:30 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> Thanks Jacopo, your revision is compiling now on buildbot, the suspense is killing me :-) >> >> I know about the entity test failing, it shouldn't affect buildbot though because that test only fails after the first run. It's a problem with the test delegator not catching some async service entity operations so som records are left over from previous test runs. I think that is caused by the JobManager being instantiated with a normal delegator during startup so no entity operations performed by it are caught by the test suite delegators. I've got a fix in mind but need to think about it a bit more. >> >> Thanks again >> Scott >> >> On 24/11/2009, at 11:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >>> Ok, >>> >>> I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. >>> >>> BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as "failure" (I don't think it is related to the work I did on accounting data): >>> >>> <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> >>> <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13>" type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> >>> at org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java:81) >>> at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:100) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) >>> </failure> >>> </testcase> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a bug that Jacques introduced this morning :-) >>>> >>>> Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a couple of days since I was working on those tests. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you fix it :-) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build notification mechanism :-) >>>>> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. >>>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>>>>> Blamelist: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
ok, fixed in rev. 883688
Jacopo On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Scott, > > thank you for the tests and report, I am on it now and will fix it soon. > I was confused by the fact that the errors were not logged under the test log files in runtime/logs folder... I will try to investigate this further. > > Jacopo > > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> Sorry Jacopo, it's still failing: >> [JUNIT] Results for test suite: accountingtests [java] 2009-11-24 10:34:33,958 (main) >> [JUNIT] Pass: false | # Tests: 16 | # Failed: 14 # Errors: 0 >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 24/11/2009, at 11:30 PM, Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> Thanks Jacopo, your revision is compiling now on buildbot, the suspense is killing me :-) >>> >>> I know about the entity test failing, it shouldn't affect buildbot though because that test only fails after the first run. It's a problem with the test delegator not catching some async service entity operations so som records are left over from previous test runs. I think that is caused by the JobManager being instantiated with a normal delegator during startup so no entity operations performed by it are caught by the test suite delegators. I've got a fix in mind but need to think about it a bit more. >>> >>> Thanks again >>> Scott >>> >>> On 24/11/2009, at 11:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, >>>> >>>> I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. >>>> >>>> BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as "failure" (I don't think it is related to the work I did on accounting data): >>>> >>>> <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> >>>> <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13>" type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> >>>> at org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java:81) >>>> at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) >>>> at org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:100) >>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) >>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) >>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) >>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) >>>> </failure> >>>> </testcase> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a bug that Jacques introduced this morning :-) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a couple of days since I was working on those tests. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you fix it :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build notification mechanism :-) >>>>>> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Scott >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. >>>>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>>>>>> Blamelist: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
Thanks Jacopo!
Regards Scott On 25/11/2009, at 2:33 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > ok, fixed in rev. 883688 > > Jacopo > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> Scott, >> >> thank you for the tests and report, I am on it now and will fix it >> soon. >> I was confused by the fact that the errors were not logged under >> the test log files in runtime/logs folder... I will try to >> investigate this further. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> Sorry Jacopo, it's still failing: >>> [JUNIT] Results for test suite: accountingtests [java] 2009-11-24 >>> 10:34:33,958 (main) >>> [JUNIT] Pass: false | # Tests: 16 | # Failed: 14 # Errors: 0 >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 24/11/2009, at 11:30 PM, Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Jacopo, your revision is compiling now on buildbot, the >>>> suspense is killing me :-) >>>> >>>> I know about the entity test failing, it shouldn't affect >>>> buildbot though because that test only fails after the first >>>> run. It's a problem with the test delegator not catching some >>>> async service entity operations so som records are left over from >>>> previous test runs. I think that is caused by the JobManager >>>> being instantiated with a normal delegator during startup so no >>>> entity operations performed by it are caught by the test suite >>>> delegators. I've got a fix in mind but need to think about it a >>>> bit more. >>>> >>>> Thanks again >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 24/11/2009, at 11:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, >>>>> >>>>> I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as >>>>> "failure" (I don't think it is related to the work I did on >>>>> accounting data): >>>>> >>>>> <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" >>>>> name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> >>>>> <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but >>>>> was:<13>" >>>>> type >>>>> = >>>>> "junit >>>>> .framework >>>>> .AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 4 >>>>> TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> >>>>> at >>>>> org >>>>> .ofbiz >>>>> .entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java: >>>>> 81) >>>>> at >>>>> org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java: >>>>> 146) >>>>> at >>>>> org >>>>> .ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java: >>>>> 100) >>>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) >>>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) >>>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) >>>>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) >>>>> </failure> >>>>> </testcase> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a >>>>>> bug that Jacques introduced this morning :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a >>>>>> couple of days since I was working on those tests. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed >>>>>>>> some data changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend >>>>>>>> on but I'll get them fixed up tonight. After that you're all >>>>>>>> on your own, you break it you fix it :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build >>>>>>> notification mechanism :-) >>>>>>> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Scott >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on >>>>>>>>> ASF Buildbot. >>>>>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel >>>>>>>>> #asftest: testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>>>>>>> Blamelist: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |