cdyne

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi,

I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Tim Ruppert
It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop it all together.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>
> Jacques
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Everybody agree?

Jacques

From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>

> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop it all together.
>
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
> --
> Tim Ruppert
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
>
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

David E. Jones-2

We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable notice (like waiting a while for comment).

On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as well remove them right away.

-David


On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Everybody agree?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop it all together.
>> Cheers,
>> Ruppert
>> --
>> Tim Ruppert
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>> o:801.649.6594
>> f:801.649.6595
>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>> Jacques
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Tim Ruppert
They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years ago.  That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>
> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as well remove them right away.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Everybody agree?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop it all together.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ruppert
>>> --
>>> Tim Ruppert
>>> HotWax Media
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>> o:801.649.6594
>>> f:801.649.6595
>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>> Jacques
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he could still find it in one of the releases...

Jacques

From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>

> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years ago.  That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using
> it any longer - but it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
>
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be using, which is anything in the project, especially without
>> reasonable notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>
>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed or something like that (I don't know if this is the
>> case), then yes might as well remove them right away.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Everybody agree?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop it all together.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ruppert
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>> HotWax Media
>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Bilgin Ibryam-2
I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.

Bilgin

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
> could still find it in one of the releases...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>
>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
>> ago.  That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ruppert
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>>
>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
>>> well remove them right away.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Everybody agree?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
>>>>> drop it all together.
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi BIlgin,

But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable...

Jacques

From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <[hidden email]>

> I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.
>
> Bilgin
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
>> could still find it in one of the releases...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
>>> ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
>>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ruppert
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
>>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
>>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
>>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
>>>> well remove them right away.
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Everybody agree?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
>>>>>> drop it all together.
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
>>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
I seems that at least this one continues to exist, so finally I will let it as is

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

> Hi BIlgin,
>
> But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <[hidden email]>
>> I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.
>>
>> Bilgin
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
>>> could still find it in one of the releases...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>
>>>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
>>>> ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
>>>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ruppert
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
>>>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
>>>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
>>>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
>>>>> well remove them right away.
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Everybody agree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
>>>>>>> drop it all together.
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
>>>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
By "this one" I meant
http://ws.cdyne.com/psaddress/addresslookup.asmx/ReturnCityState?zipcode=90010&LicenseKey=0

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

>I seems that at least this one continues to exist, so finally I will let it as is
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> Hi BIlgin,
>>
>> But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <[hidden email]>
>>> I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.
>>>
>>> Bilgin
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
>>>> could still find it in one of the releases...
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
>>>>> ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
>>>>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
>>>>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
>>>>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
>>>>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
>>>>>> well remove them right away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everybody agree?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
>>>>>>>> drop it all together.
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
>>>>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Tim Ruppert
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
I did some brief looking on their site and they are definitely deprecated to their new ones.  I'd deprecate it and then remove it before the next release - just to be safe.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi BIlgin,
>
> But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <[hidden email]>
>> I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.
>> Bilgin
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
>>> could still find it in one of the releases...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>
>>>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
>>>> ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
>>>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ruppert
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
>>>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
>>>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
>>>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
>>>>> well remove them right away.
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Everybody agree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
>>>>>>> drop it all together.
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
>>>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: cdyne

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
OK, so Bilgin was right, I will deprecate but will also move it to commonext. Do you know what I should put in the see tag? If
someone wants to implement the new version... At least
a link for now should be enough...

 /**
 * @deprecated
 * @see #????
 */

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>

>I did some brief looking on their site and they are definitely deprecated to their new ones.  I'd deprecate it and then remove it
>before the next release - just to be safe.
>
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi BIlgin,
>>
>> But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <[hidden email]>
>>> I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.
>>> Bilgin
>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
>>>> could still find it in one of the releases...
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
>>>>> ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
>>>>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
>>>>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
>>>>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
>>>>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
>>>>>> well remove them right away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everybody agree?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
>>>>>>>> drop it all together.
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
>>>>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>