default-no-eca

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

default-no-eca

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi,

We still have the default-no-eca delegator definition in entityengine.xml

I believe it was used when OFBiz was still using a workflow engine (Shark was the last). I don't see any needs now, but maybe by Hans with Activiti.

So my question: should we get rid of it? Else we should simply document it in entityengine.xml with the other delegator (a simple sentence)

Thanks

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: default-no-eca

Nicolas Malin-2
We use this definition when we create a service that manage many data
for massive import for performance or escape functional case.

I'm in favor to keep it, or if we rip maybe set it to comment with an
example to how use it

Nicolas


Le 04/10/2017 à 10:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> We still have the default-no-eca delegator definition in entityengine.xml
>
> I believe it was used when OFBiz was still using a workflow engine
> (Shark was the last). I don't see any needs now, but maybe by Hans
> with Activiti.
>
> So my question: should we get rid of it? Else we should simply
> document it in entityengine.xml with the other delegator (a simple
> sentence)
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: default-no-eca

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Thanks Nicolas,

Then I suggest to keep it and document where it's used (in entityengine.xm) with a simple sentence

What would you suggest, maybe simply using the example you gave?

Jacques


Le 04/10/2017 à 16:53, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

> We use this definition when we create a service that manage many data for massive import for performance or escape functional case.
>
> I'm in favor to keep it, or if we rip maybe set it to comment with an example to how use it
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> Le 04/10/2017 à 10:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> We still have the default-no-eca delegator definition in entityengine.xml
>>
>> I believe it was used when OFBiz was still using a workflow engine (Shark was the last). I don't see any needs now, but maybe by Hans with Activiti.
>>
>> So my question: should we get rid of it? Else we should simply document it in entityengine.xml with the other delegator (a simple sentence)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: default-no-eca

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Done at r1811571

Jacques


Le 04/10/2017 à 17:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Thanks Nicolas,
>
> Then I suggest to keep it and document where it's used (in entityengine.xm) with a simple sentence
>
> What would you suggest, maybe simply using the example you gave?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 04/10/2017 à 16:53, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>> We use this definition when we create a service that manage many data for massive import for performance or escape functional case.
>>
>> I'm in favor to keep it, or if we rip maybe set it to comment with an example to how use it
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> Le 04/10/2017 à 10:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We still have the default-no-eca delegator definition in entityengine.xml
>>>
>>> I believe it was used when OFBiz was still using a workflow engine (Shark was the last). I don't see any needs now, but maybe by Hans with Activiti.
>>>
>>> So my question: should we get rid of it? Else we should simply document it in entityengine.xml with the other delegator (a simple sentence)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: default-no-eca

Nicolas Malin-2
Thanks Jacques, I appreciate :)

Nicolas


Le 09/10/2017 à 19:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Done at r1811571
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 04/10/2017 à 17:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Thanks Nicolas,
>>
>> Then I suggest to keep it and document where it's used (in
>> entityengine.xm) with a simple sentence
>>
>> What would you suggest, maybe simply using the example you gave?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 04/10/2017 à 16:53, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>> We use this definition when we create a service that manage many
>>> data for massive import for performance or escape functional case.
>>>
>>> I'm in favor to keep it, or if we rip maybe set it to comment with
>>> an example to how use it
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 04/10/2017 à 10:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We still have the default-no-eca delegator definition in
>>>> entityengine.xml
>>>>
>>>> I believe it was used when OFBiz was still using a workflow engine
>>>> (Shark was the last). I don't see any needs now, but maybe by Hans
>>>> with Activiti.
>>>>
>>>> So my question: should we get rid of it? Else we should simply
>>>> document it in entityengine.xml with the other delegator (a simple
>>>> sentence)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>