"dependent-on" clause

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

"dependent-on" clause

Fabien JALABERT
Hello,

can someone explain me the importance of the attribute when modeling an
entity or a view.

What is the exact difference between a primary key and foreign key that
references my Type1 and the "dependant-on type1" clause ? Is this just
help to make model easier to understand to other readers ?

Thanks a lot.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "dependent-on" clause

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
This is not already used from David's (and his HotWax Media partners) recent great gift :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Advanced+Framework+Transcription+Work+Plan

Okay dependent-on. This is not used right now, but it is
part of kind of a theory of a data model, where you can
specify that this entity is dependent on some sort of a
primary entity. And the intent was to use this for things
like data exporting or other such things, to automatically
follow a tree of entities and do something with them as
a group. But nothing is really implemented based on
this right now.
Okay and the same, you'll note that the view entity also
as a dependent-on field. Same situation there; nothing
is really using it. But it was part of the initial design, as
part of the theory on how a data model can fit together.

Jacques

From: "Fabien JALABERT" <[hidden email]>
> Hello,
>
> can someone explain me the importance of the attribute when modeling an entity or a view.
>
> What is the exact difference between a primary key and foreign key that references my Type1 and the "dependant-on type1" clause ?
> Is this just help to make model easier to understand to other readers ?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>