entity-auto improvement ?

[Malin Nicolas]

Hello all,

Currently, I works to convert humanres service from mini-lang to
entity-auto. I choose this component for the density of entity with
min-lang CRUD.
I'm faced to two cases that the entity-auto not managing.

Association entity with a fromDate on primary key like and association
entity with a own sequence like orderAdjustment. Entity auto accept :
  * entity with single pk (Invoice)
  * entity with double pk (InvoiceItem)
  * entity with more than two pk but all present pk field are present on
service in.

On humanres I have some entity that have this problem (like PartyQual
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5760),
so my question is : do you think that would be interested to improve the
create action on entity-auto for unsupported case ?

I have a patch to resolve this issue but I prefer to be sure that I
don't failed something on the entity-auto concept.

Nicolas

[Nicolas Malin-2]

I opened the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5800 for
any comments on the given resolution.
I will continue my tests to ensure that it don't create any regression.

Nicolas


Le 23/09/2014 00:09, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

> Hello all,
>
> Currently, I works to convert humanres service from mini-lang to
> entity-auto. I choose this component for the density of entity with
> min-lang CRUD.
> I'm faced to two cases that the entity-auto not managing.
>
> Association entity with a fromDate on primary key like and association
> entity with a own sequence like orderAdjustment. Entity auto accept :
>  * entity with single pk (Invoice)
>  * entity with double pk (InvoiceItem)
>  * entity with more than two pk but all present pk field are present
> on service in.
>
> On humanres I have some entity that have this problem (like PartyQual
> see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5760),
> so my question is : do you think that would be interested to improve
> the create action on entity-auto for unsupported case ?
>
> I have a patch to resolve this issue but I prefer to be sure that I
> don't failed something on the entity-auto concept.
>
> Nicolas
>
>