geronimo component alone?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

geronimo component alone?

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi,

At I wrote I wonder if we should let the geronimo component alone with only 2 classes, could we not put that in entity or entityext?

Opinions?

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: geronimo component alone?

Jacopo Cappellato-5
I think that making it part of the entity component would make sense.

Jacopo


On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At I wrote I wonder if we should let the geronimo component alone with
> only 2 classes, could we not put that in entity or entityext?
>
> Opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: geronimo component alone?

taher
Yup +1 makes sense.

To that end I also think all *ext components do not make much sense and
should be merged with their base counterparts.

On Aug 5, 2016 2:43 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think that making it part of the entity component would make sense.
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > At I wrote I wonder if we should let the geronimo component alone with
> > only 2 classes, could we not put that in entity or entityext?
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
>