[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17283241#comment-17283241 ]
Michael Brohl edited comment on OFBIZ-10150 at 2/11/21, 5:42 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~jleroux] Do you still want this to be open as a bug?
Should we not better close this specific bug issue and create another one as an improvement?
was (Author: mbrohl):
[~jleroux] Do you still want this to be open as a bug?
Should we not better close this specifix bug issue and create another one as an improvement?
> supplierProductId Should Have Consistent Types Across Entities.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10150
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10150> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: order, product
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 18.12, Release Branch 17.12, Trunk
> Environment: all
> Reporter: jesse thomas
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: OFBIZ-10150.patch
>
>
> During some data migration I hit an issue where my data for supplierProductId was too long. So I looked up the fields and noticed that the order item entity had a different type for the field than the supplier product entity. I think it would be a good idea to pick one so the two fields can be treated consistently. I would vote for id-long, but I think either way it would be good to have them be the same type. There are other fields that have this issue too if you are interested?
>
> Thanks!
> applications/datamodel/entitydef/order-entitymodel.xml:
> <entity entity-name="OrderItem".......
> <field name="supplierProductId" type="id-long"></field>
> applications/datamodel/entitydef/product-entitymodel.xml:
> <entity entity-name="SupplierProduct"......
> <field name="supplierProductId" type="id"></field>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
Locked
