[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14332289#comment-14332289 ]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-5851 at 2/22/15 6:53 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I see no necessity to change the formatting into <screen name="CommonRoutingDecorator">
Also why not put <screen name="RoutingParties"> at the end, to facilitate the review of RoutingScreens.xml?
Also same type of remark than in OFBIZ-5706:
{quote}
While at it why not have a through date, why not be able to remove a party, why not show the parties in ...?
{quote}
For the rest, at 1st glance (review and test) these changes sounds good to me
was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
I see no necessity to change the formatting into <screen name="CommonRoutingDecorator">
Also why not put <screen name="RoutingParties"> to facilitate the review of RoutingScreens.xml?
Also same type of remark than in OFBIZ-5706:
{quote}
While at it why not have a through date, why not be able to remove a party, why not show the parties in ...?
{quote}
For the rest, at 1st glance (review and test) these changes sounds good to me
> Add ability to assign parties to Production Schemas
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5851
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5851> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: manufacturing
> Reporter: Pierre Smits
> Assignee: Pierre Smits
> Attachments: OFBIZ-5851-RoutingPartyAssoc.patch
>
>
> Currently it is not possible to assign standard parties to a production schema, e.g. the manufacturing party or the production manager.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Locked
