[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902539#comment-14902539 ]
Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-6647 at 9/22/15 12:58 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
I don't mind having both. Adrian explained why it is this way.
was (Author: pfm.smits):
I don't having both. Adrian explained why it is this way.
> Refactoring to consolidate different Calendar implementations
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6647
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
> Reporter: Michael Brohl
> Assignee: Michael Brohl
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> This came up in reference to [6594|
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6594]:
> Piere Smits: "Currently we are using 'import com.ibm.icu.util.Calendar' at various places. But we're also using 'java.util.Calendar' at other places.
> Better is it to make a choice for consistency."
> We should fisrt analyze the usage of different implementations and the impact of replacing one with the other (e.g. what's the difference of these implementations).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Locked
