[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16555649#comment-16555649 ]
Taher Alkhateeb commented on OFBIZ-10485:
-----------------------------------------
The first two patches are implemented successfully.
Would you kindly explain the reason for using the Deque Interface in the third patch Mathieu?
> Refactor MapContext
> -------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10485
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10485> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: base
> Reporter: Mathieu Lirzin
> Assignee: Taher Alkhateeb
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-10485_0001-Remove-MapContext-dead-code.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0002-Add-missing-Override-in-MapContext.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0003-Use-the-Deque-interface-in-MapContext.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0004-Rewrite-MapContext-isEmpty.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0005-Rewrite-MapContext-containsKey.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0006-Rewrite-MapContext-keySet.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0007-Remove-MapContext.ListSet-class.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0008-Inline-MapContext-getMapContext.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0009-Rename-stackList-to-maps.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0010-Rework-comments.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0011-Add-entryStream.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0012-Add-withMapContainingKey.patch, OFBIZ-10485_0013-Rewrite-size.patch
>
>
> Following conversation [
https://lists.apache.org/thread.htmlf1729ef5eafcf71adfbed0c3ea61dfb73225dff82abc4a57c3de8ed5@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E] on
[hidden email].
> Here is a first batch of patches to clean things up. Those patches are meant to be applied in order.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
Locked
