[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16569119#comment-16569119 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-10504:
-----------------------------------------
Hi GIl,
Your are totally right. We did already, long ago....
It's hard to find in the MLs (
https://ofbiz.markmail.org/search/?q=vote+jira). But you can trust me and we have that:
https://s.apache.org/rR5g guideline point 12) :)
So I think we should make the voting process more prominent and clear (understand short writting). We could use Sharan's recent 2 proposals (that's in both, look for "Jira offers a voting mechanism ".)
But sincerely I think we need to split our Contributors Best Practices and all such documents (including Sharan's proposals). What's the point of having complete documents, when nobody really read them because they are too long? That could be part of the ascii documentation effort: refactoring the documentation (understand split files, like we do for Java class ;))
I begin to wonder if, when I'll completely retire, I'll not totally focus on a such effort. We all know it's worth more than we expect :)
> Remove all unnecessary boxing and unboxing in Java classes
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10504
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10504> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Gil Portenseigne
> Assignee: Gil Portenseigne
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: OFBIZ-10504_remove_unboxing_and_boxing.patch, OFBIZ-10504_remove_unboxing_and_boxing_Plugins.patch
>
>
> Since JAVA 5, the automatic conversion of primitive data types into its equivalent Wrapper type that is known as boxing and opposite operation is known as unboxing, is automatically done.
> There is no need for conversion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
Locked
