[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10593) ‘EntityConditionVisitor’ is a confused visitor pattern

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10593) ‘EntityConditionVisitor’ is a confused visitor pattern

Nicolas Malin (Jira)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16647939#comment-16647939 ]

Gil Portenseigne commented on OFBIZ-10593:
------------------------------------------

Hello [~mthl], i did review your final patch to refactor to a proper visitor pattern.
Great job ! I only found one typo into the well detailed Javadoc ;).

This implementation is far more understandable, and will hopefully ease OFBIZ-10579 improvement by [~suraj.khurana].

If nobody already did yet, we need to create a Jira to isolate EntityOperator and EntityConditionValue from EntityConditionBase. I'll check it out.

Thanks !


> ‘EntityConditionVisitor’ is a confused visitor pattern
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-10593
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10593
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>            Reporter: Mathieu Lirzin
>            Assignee: Mathieu Lirzin
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-10593_Implement-EntityConditionVisitor-properly.patch
>
>
> {{EntityConditionVisitor}} interface is supposed to implement the visitor pattern which supposes a set of classes meant to be visited using an {{accept}} method and a visitor with multiple {{visit}} method overloads (one for each visited class).
> Currently {{EntityConditionVisitor}} contains both {{accept}} and {{visit}} methods which make *no sense*
> {code:java}
> public interface EntityConditionVisitor {
>     <T> void visit(T obj);
>     <T> void accept(T obj);
>     void acceptObject(Object obj);
>     void acceptEntityCondition(EntityCondition condition);
>     <T extends EntityCondition> void acceptEntityJoinOperator(EntityJoinOperator op, List<T> conditions);
>     <L,R,T> void acceptEntityOperator(EntityOperator<L, R, T> op, L lhs, R rhs);
>     <L,R> void acceptEntityComparisonOperator(EntityComparisonOperator<L, R> op, L lhs, R rhs);
>     void acceptEntityConditionValue(EntityConditionValue value);
>     void acceptEntityFieldValue(EntityFieldValue value);
>     void acceptEntityExpr(EntityExpr expr);
>     <T extends EntityCondition> void acceptEntityConditionList(EntityConditionList<T> list);
>     void acceptEntityFieldMap(EntityFieldMap fieldMap);
>     void acceptEntityConditionFunction(EntityConditionFunction func, EntityCondition nested);
>     <T extends Comparable<?>> void acceptEntityFunction(EntityFunction<T> func);
>     void acceptEntityWhereString(EntityWhereString condition);
>     void acceptEntityDateFilterCondition(EntityDateFilterCondition condition);
> }
> {code}
> this confusion is visible in the {{EntityCondition}} which has both a {{visit}} and an {{accept}} method, even if it is only supposed to accept a visitor.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)