[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17158619#comment-17158619 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-11890:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1d391df2f023e273f95f820fd7400ecbed5bfe25 in ofbiz-framework's branch refs/heads/trunk from Jacques Le Roux
[
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-framework.git;h=1d391df ]
Improved: User Error.ftl everywhere it's not yet used (OFBIZ-11890)
At
https://markmail.org/message/n76cchtriexxmgm7 I asked
Why having the ftl handlers only in webtools controller? BTW it makes the XSD
documentation awkward because it speaks about the ftl handlers being in
handlers-controller.xml
Why not using error.ftl in common-controller.xml instead of error.jsp?
Same question for plugins.
And answered
I believe we could change all that and definitely get rid of error.jsp
(error.ftl is already in all supported releases branches)
> User Error.ftl everywhere it's not yet used
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11890
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11890> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ALL COMPONENTS
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Priority: Minor
>
> At
https://markmail.org/message/n76cchtriexxmgm7 I asked
> {quote}
> # Why having the ftl handlers only in webtools controller? BTW it makes the XSD documentation awkward because it speaks about the ftl handlers being in handlers-controller.xml
> # Why not using error.ftl in common-controller.xml instead of error.jsp?
> # Same question for plugins.
> {quote}
> and answered
> {quote}
> I believe we could change all that and definitely get rid of error.jsp (error.ftl is already in all supported releases branches)
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
Locked
