[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13095450#comment-13095450 ]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-149:
----------------------------------
there has been a lot of changes since this issue.
can this be closed and use
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851> Better describe complex party relationships
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-149
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: party
> Reporter: Chris Howe
> Assignee: David E. Jones
> Attachments: PartyRelationship.patch, necessaryChangeLog.txt
>
>
> Change to the party data model to support relationships where parties act in several capacities (roles) and allowing polynary relationships.
> If someone could describe a situation where the direcition of the role matters (partyIdTo/partyIdFrom) and where the roleType is insuficient to understand the direction I will try to come up with a solution. I'm trying to understand if simply better role designations would alleviate ambiguity or if there is a real need to support direction.
> I began a discussion on this topic, there has yet to be any response
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/200608.mbox/%3c20060809155147.18528.qmail@...%3e--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Locked
