[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4053) Implement an Entity Query Builder

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4053) Implement an Entity Query Builder

Nicolas Malin (Jira)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14050667#comment-14050667 ]

Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-4053:
-----------------------------------

It's relevant because Adrian was asking for the new builder to not have a cache option, but I think it should, because cache clearing is hard(because of complex views, because caching an entity when you just want to do an update shouldn't be done).  

> Implement an Entity Query Builder
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-4053
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4053
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: framework
>    Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>            Reporter: Scott Gray
>            Assignee: Scott Gray
>         Attachments: builder.patch
>
>
> As discussed on the dev list here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/l6kiywqzfj656dhc
> Attached is an initial implementation of builder classes (of sorts) that make use of method chaining in order to simplify use of the Delegator interface to query entities.
> Rather than taking all possible query parameters into a single method as the delegator does, this implementation instead builds a query through a succession of distinct method calls.
> A simple example:
> {code}
> // Using the Delegator interface directly
> eli = delegator.find("FinAccountTrans", condition, null, null, UtilMisc.toList("-transactionDate"), null);
> // Using the new implementation
> eli = EntityBuilderUtil.list(delegator).from("FinAccountTrans").where(condition).orderBy("-transactionDate").iterator();
> {code}
> A more complex example:
> {code}
> // Delegator
> EntityCondition queryConditionsList = EntityCondition.makeCondition(allConditions, EntityOperator.AND);
> EntityFindOptions options = new EntityFindOptions(true, EntityFindOptions.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, EntityFindOptions.CONCUR_READ_ONLY, true);
> options.setMaxRows(viewSize * (viewIndex + 1));
> EntityListIterator iterator = delegator.find("OrderHeader", queryConditionsList, null, null, UtilMisc.toList("orderDate DESC"), options);
> // becomes
> EntityListIterator iterator = EntityBuilderUtil.list(delegator).distinct()
>                                                                .from("OrderHeader")
>                                                                .where(allConditions)
>                                                                .orderBy("orderDate DESC")
>                                                                .maxRows(viewSize * (viewIndex + 1))
>                                                                .cursorScrollInsensitive()
>                                                                .iterator();
> {code}
> A couple of issues with the implementation so far that I'm not entirely happy with:
> - I'm not so sure that I like EntityBuilderUtil.list(delegator) in place of something like EntityList.use(delegator).  The latter requires less typing and I think is more intuitive than typing EntityBuilderUtil because of its similarities to the corresponding minilang method calls, I actually kept having trouble remembering what it was called when converting some delegator calls over.  It also requires a little more typing (16-17 characters vs. 12-13), not a big deal but every little bit helps with what would be a very commonly used class.
> - I'm struggling to see the point of having the GenericQueryBuilder interface, the two classes share very little in the way of API and its use seems a little superfluous to me.
> Opinions on the above points or anything else to do with the implementation are most welcome.  I'd like to get the API locked down (and hopefully some javadocs in place) before committing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)