[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497123 ]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-575:
-----------------------------------------
I've reviewed the code and it looks good.
Are there any comments/concerns before I go on with my tests and then commit it?
> Upgrade jdbm library to version 1.0
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-575
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-575> Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Peter Goron
> Assigned To: Jacopo Cappellato
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: jdbm-1.0-classpath.patch, jdbm-1.0.jar, jdbm-1.0.patch
>
>
> While I was playing with ofbiz framework only in a project based on maven, I was obliged to upgrade jdbm library to version 1.0.
> This version has been released more than one years ago and is considered as the latest stable version.
> The only change made to ofbiz code concerns JdbmRecordManager class. Now jdbm.recman.BaseRecordManager class is final and can not be inherited. So I've replaced inherance by implementation of jdbm.RecordManager interface and delegated all interface's method calls to an instance of BaseRecordManager (see jdbm-1.0.patch). The few tests I've done don't show any regressions (but they don't have 100% coverage ;-)).
> I've also updated eclipse's classpath entries (see jdbm-1.0-classpath.patch).
> Jdbm doesn't seem to be an active project anymore. Maybe we must start thinking about another project to manage ofbiz cache stuff to avoid to have to maintain this stuff ourself. I've heard some interesting features from ehcache project (ehcache.sourceforge.net) like distributed caches and scalability.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Locked
