[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14275225#comment-14275225 ]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5959:
-------------------------------------
I know. There is a lot in DMR that is not applied or applied differently in OFBiz.
We have to keep in mind that everything has a lifespan. Filtering on that ( filter-by-date="true" ) ensures that the system doesn't provide options that will lead to error messages. But not only that, we then also ensure that no more data is sent to the client than applicable/necessary.
Btw, AgreementRole doesn't have the lifespan field. Like many other entities.
> Add lifespan fields to PartyRole
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5959
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5959> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: party
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Pierre Smits
> Labels: role, roles
> Attachments: OFBIZ-5959-PartyRoleLifeSpan.patch
>
>
> Currently the assignments of roles to parties are boolean (there or not there).
> However, these role assignments also have a lifespan. This can be achieved by adding fromDate and thruDate fields.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Locked
