[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14590052#comment-14590052 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6513:
----------------------------------------
Another question is should we consider this a bug? I don't think so but it's a moot point, countyGeoId an GeoPointId are there for a long time already...
> countyGeoId and geoPointId fields are missing in PartyAndPostalAddress entity view
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6513
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6513> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: party
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> Rather than adding both fields, I will rather add an allias-all. Then if ever we add new fields to PostalAddress they will not miss there.
> While at it I looked for such issues in other entity views based on PostalAddress. All but PartyExport (accounting) and ShipmentManifestView use an allias-all on PostalAddress.
> I think we should do the same for ShipmentManifestView but I'm not sure about PartyExport, though I don't see an issue there using an allias-all too.
> Opinions?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Locked
