[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902531#comment-14902531 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6647:
----------------------------------------
Pierre's wish would be to use only one, we definitively picked IBM's but Oracle's stayed in some places (or was added later). I guess w/o a contribution this situation will continue...
> Refactoring to consolidate different Calendar implementations
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6647
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
> Reporter: Michael Brohl
> Assignee: Michael Brohl
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> This came up in reference to [6594|
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6594]:
> Piere Smits: "Currently we are using 'import com.ibm.icu.util.Calendar' at various places. But we're also using 'java.util.Calendar' at other places.
> Better is it to make a choice for consistency."
> We should fisrt analyze the usage of different implementations and the impact of replacing one with the other (e.g. what's the difference of these implementations).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Locked
