[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15360348#comment-15360348 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-7682:
----------------------------------------
I thought and checked about the usefulness of the checkbook number. I spoke about it because I remembered being asked for it when I loose my wallet where I put a blank check I detached from the checkbook. I did not know the number of the check, so I had to give them the checkbook number to cancel the whole checkbook. It seems indeed this is something completely unexpected in an ERP, so yes better forget it :)
I agree about Branch Code ("Code Guichet" in French). BTW, if we go this way, looking at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_code we could maybe add other fields (see Germany for instance)? Then should we not put them also on EftAccount? Are we going too far?
> Define and add new entity for 'Check' as Payment Method
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7682
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7682> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: accounting
> Affects Versions: 14.12.01, 15.12.01
> Reporter: Swapnil Shah
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7682.patch
>
>
> Based on the concluded requirement on OFBIZ-6899. Let's define Check as new entity as follows (somewhat on similar lines as EFT_ACCOUNT) so as to store all relevant details related to Check used as payment method for any party.
> PAYMENT_METHOD_ID (PK & FK with PAYMENT_METHOD)
> BANK_NAME
> ROUTING_NUMBER
> ACCOUNT_TYPE
> ACCOUNT_NUMBER
> NAME_ON_ACCOUNT
> COMPANY_NAME_ON_ACCOUNT
> CONTACT_MECH_ID (FK with CONTACT_MECH & POSTAL_ADDRESS)
> LAST_UPDATED_STAMP
> LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP
> CREATED_STAMP
> CREATED_TX_STAMP
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Locked
