[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16177813#comment-16177813 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-9620:
----------------------------------------
Nope, thanks Rishi. There is no real data model change. You can refer to explanations at top of this page.
{quote}
Committers should make an entry in this list if your revision causes a need for any manual data migration or other update steps in production instances:
* A file change which need additional unload/reload/convert activities
* Any tables which can be deleted(dropped) because they are not used anymore.
* Any other required activity to keep your production site operational
{quote}
> Extend SecurityGroup entity and add name/groupName field
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9620
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9620> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Suraj Khurana
> Assignee: Rishi Solanki
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9620.patch
>
>
> Currently, SecurityGroup entity has groupId and description fields in that, it should also have groupName/name field as well, as a description can be very long and groupName can be used to represent SecurityGroup in a better manner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
Locked
