[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-965) Purchase orders: incorrect units received when more issuances to the shipment are done without receiving

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-965) Purchase orders: incorrect units received when more issuances to the shipment are done without receiving

Nicolas Malin (Jira)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14228630#comment-14228630 ]

Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-965:
-----------------------------------------

Thank you for the tests [~swash78]. The ticket is very old and I filed it on behalf of a user that reported this issue in the mailing list: I am not also able to recreate this issue and it has been probably fixed sometime over the last years.
I agree it can be marked as resolved.

> Purchase orders: incorrect units received when more issuances to the shipment are done without receiving
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-965
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: product
>            Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Inventory_Receipt.png, PO_with_Receipt.png, SO_with_Shipment.png
>
>
> The following issue has been reported by Iain Fogg:
> "I first issues 2 items to the shipment, then issued 1, then issued 1, and it looks like the system has decided to add 12 to the inventory (I ordered 4)."
> "[...] In the normal course of operations, I issue less than the order quantity of an item all the time (assuming my supplier shipped me less than the order quantity), but of course, once I issue the items I receive them into inventory. In this case, I issued 2, then 1, then 1 without Receiving in between. I'm not saying this was necessarily sensible, but I wouldn't have expected the odd behaviour either."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)