[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
37 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

rohit
hi,

when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it that expected at all...

thanks

rohit
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi Rohit,

Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you help?

Thanks

Jacques

From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>

>
> hi,
>
> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it that
> expected at all...
>
> thanks
>
> rohit
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Bruno Busco
What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?

-Bruno

2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>

> Hi Rohit,
>
> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you help?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>
>
>> hi,
>>
>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it that
>> expected at all...
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> rohit
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a good idea indeed.
This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from the trunk.
With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge
and should not worry too much.

On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for
me...

BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo
and removing Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr

Jacques

From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>

> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>
> -Bruno
>
> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>
>> Hi Rohit,
>>
>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you help?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it that
>>> expected at all...
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> rohit
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Jacopo Cappellato-4
We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge with jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.

Jacopo

On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a good idea indeed.
> This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from the trunk.
> With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and should not worry too much.
>
> On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>
> BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
> http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>
>> -Bruno
>>
>> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>
>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>
>>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you help?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it that
>>>> expected at all...
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> rohit
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Bruno Busco
I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.

-Bruno


2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>

> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge with
> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a
> good idea indeed.
> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from the
> trunk.
> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and should
> not worry too much.
> >
> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
> >
> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing
> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
> >>
> >> -Bruno
> >>
> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
> >>
> >>> Hi Rohit,
> >>>
> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
> help?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it
> that
> >>>> expected at all...
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> rohit
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> View this message in context:
> >>>>
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Other opinions?

Jacques

From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>

>I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>
> -Bruno
>
>
> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>
>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge with
>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a
>> good idea indeed.
>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from the
>> trunk.
>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and should
>> not worry too much.
>> >
>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>> >
>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing
>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>> >
>> > Jacques
>> >
>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>> >>
>> >> -Bruno
>> >>
>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>> >>>
>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>> help?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> Jacques
>> >>>
>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it
>> that
>> >>>> expected at all...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> thanks
>> >>>>
>> >>>> rohit
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> View this message in context:
>> >>>>
>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Divesh Dutta
My vote is to merge jquery, and then release branch.

Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.


On Nov 28, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Other opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>> -Bruno
>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge with
>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a
>>> good idea indeed.
>>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from the
>>> trunk.
>>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and should
>>> not worry too much.
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>> >
>>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing
>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>> >
>>> > Jacques
>>> >
>>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>> >>
>>> >> -Bruno
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>> help?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jacques
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> hi,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck, it
>>> that
>>> >>>> expected at all...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> thanks
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> rohit
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>>
>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Pranay Pandey-2
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
I would say merge jQuery, and then release branch.

Thanks & Regards
--
Pranay Pandey
HotWax Media | www.hotwaxmedia.com
[hidden email]


On Nov 28, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Other opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with  
>> jQuery.
>> -Bruno
>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the  
>>> merge with
>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before  
>>> could be a
>>> good idea indeed.
>>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo  
>>> from the
>>> trunk.
>>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge  
>>> and should
>>> not worry too much.
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the  
>>> next
>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for  
>>> me...
>>> >
>>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread  
>>> (Bilgin
>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and  
>>> removing
>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>> >
>>> > Jacques
>>> >
>>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the  
>>> jquery ?
>>> >>
>>> >> -Bruno
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing,  
>>> could you
>>> help?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jacques
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> hi,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the  
>>> truck, it
>>> that
>>> >>>> expected at all...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> thanks
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> rohit
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>>
>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Ankit Jain-3
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
+1 to merge jQuery then release branch.

--

Thanks&  Regards:
Ankit Jain


On Sunday 28 November 2010 11:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Other opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>>
>> -Bruno
>>
>>
>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>
>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the
>>> merge with
>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could
>>> be a
>>> good idea indeed.
>>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo
>>> from the
>>> trunk.
>>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>> should
>>> not worry too much.
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>> >
>>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and
>>> removing
>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>> >
>>> > Jacques
>>> >
>>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>> >>
>>> >> -Bruno
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>> help?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jacques
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> hi,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the
>>> truck, it
>>> that
>>> >>>> expected at all...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> thanks
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> rohit
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>>
>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html 
>>>
>>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Thanks Ankit, Pranay, Divesh,

Hoho, looks like we will need a vote? Bruno?

Jacques

From: "Ankit Jain" <[hidden email]>

> +1 to merge jQuery then release branch.
>
> --
>
> Thanks&  Regards:
> Ankit Jain
>
>
> On Sunday 28 November 2010 11:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Other opinions?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>>>
>>> -Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the
>>>> merge with
>>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could
>>>> be a
>>>> good idea indeed.
>>>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo
>>>> from the
>>>> trunk.
>>>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>>> should
>>>> not worry too much.
>>>> >
>>>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>>> >
>>>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and
>>>> removing
>>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>>> >
>>>> > Jacques
>>>> >
>>>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -Bruno
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>>> help?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Jacques
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> hi,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the
>>>> truck, it
>>>> that
>>>> >>>> expected at all...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> thanks
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> rohit
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> --
>>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html 
>>>>
>>>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Deepak Dixit-2
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux

jQuery provide lot of pluginns and good thing is that all of these
pluginns are cross browser compatible.

So  +1 for  merge jQuery with trunk and then create release branch with
jQuery.

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
Contact :- +91-98267-54548
Skype Id :- deepakdixit



Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Other opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>>
>> -Bruno
>>
>>
>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>
>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the
>>> merge with
>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could
>>> be a
>>> good idea indeed.
>>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo
>>> from the
>>> trunk.
>>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>> should
>>> not worry too much.
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>> >
>>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and
>>> removing
>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>> >
>>> > Jacques
>>> >
>>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>> >>
>>> >> -Bruno
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>> help?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jacques
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> hi,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the
>>> truck, it
>>> that
>>> >>>> expected at all...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> thanks
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> rohit
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>>
>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html 
>>>
>>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Bruno Busco
I vote for doing a release branch first and then merge jQuery.

This will let people to have a branch with the actual trunk in case the
jQuery causes any issues to them.

Thank you,
Bruno

2010/12/1 Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]>

>
> jQuery provide lot of pluginns and good thing is that all of these pluginns
> are cross browser compatible.
>
> So  +1 for  merge jQuery with trunk and then create release branch with
> jQuery.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
> HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
> Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
> Contact :- +91-98267-54548
> Skype Id :- deepakdixit
>
>
>
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Other opinions?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>
>>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>>>
>>> -Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>  We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge
>>>> with
>>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a
>>>> good idea indeed.
>>>> > This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from
>>>> the
>>>> trunk.
>>>> > With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>>> should
>>>> not worry too much.
>>>> >
>>>> > On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>>> >
>>>> > BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing
>>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>>> > http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>>> >
>>>> > Jacques
>>>> >
>>>> > From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>> >> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -Bruno
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi Rohit,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>>> help?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Jacques
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> hi,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck,
>>>> it
>>>> that
>>>> >>>> expected at all...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> thanks
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> rohit
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> --
>>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>>> >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Divesh Dutta
I think, if issues come then we can attack them. In this way we will have release branch with Jquery.

Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.

On Dec 1, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:

> I vote for doing a release branch first and then merge jQuery.
>
> This will let people to have a branch with the actual trunk in case the
> jQuery causes any issues to them.
>
> Thank you,
> Bruno
>
> 2010/12/1 Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]>
>
>>
>> jQuery provide lot of pluginns and good thing is that all of these pluginns
>> are cross browser compatible.
>>
>> So  +1 for  merge jQuery with trunk and then create release branch with
>> jQuery.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> --
>> Deepak Dixit
>> HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
>> Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
>> Contact :- +91-98267-54548
>> Skype Id :- deepakdixit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Other opinions?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>>>>
>>>> -Bruno
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>>>
>>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge
>>>>> with
>>>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a
>>>>> good idea indeed.
>>>>>> This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from
>>>>> the
>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>> With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>>>> should
>>>>> not worry too much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing
>>>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>>>> help?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck,
>>>>> it
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> expected at all...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> rohit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>>>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
I agree, we already use the jQuery branch in a custom project without issues so far.
The only problem we crossed is related to jQuery 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 and we had to revert to 1.4.2.
The problem was related to the use of jQuery.live() and was reproductible with OFBiz OOTB. I have still to report it to jQuery team,
not easy
http://docs.jquery.com/How_to_Report_Bugs
http://bugs.jquery.com/search?ticket=on&q=live+1.4.3&page=2&noquickjump=1
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7340
http://jsfiddle.net/

There are options:
* to put a tag in the trunk before merging, but it's static and does not help much. You have still to handle the "future" of the tag
:/
* to create a branch before mergin, but I don't like it much; it looks like a Prototype/Dojo fork....

So yes I'd also vote to merge it in the trunk and not worry too much, we should be able to quickly handle issues, if any...

Jacques

From: "Divesh Dutta" <[hidden email]>

>I think, if issues come then we can attack them. In this way we will have release branch with Jquery.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Divesh Dutta.
>
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
>
>> I vote for doing a release branch first and then merge jQuery.
>>
>> This will let people to have a branch with the actual trunk in case the
>> jQuery causes any issues to them.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bruno
>>
>> 2010/12/1 Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]>
>>
>>>
>>> jQuery provide lot of pluginns and good thing is that all of these pluginns
>>> are cross browser compatible.
>>>
>>> So  +1 for  merge jQuery with trunk and then create release branch with
>>> jQuery.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> --
>>> Deepak Dixit
>>> HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
>>> Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>> Contact :- +91-98267-54548
>>> Skype Id :- deepakdixit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Other opinions?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>>
>>>>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with jQuery.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the merge
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before could be a
>>>>>> good idea indeed.
>>>>>>> This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>> With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>>>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> not worry too much.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the next
>>>>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for me...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread (Bilgin
>>>>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and removing
>>>>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> What about creating a new release branch before merging the jquery ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing, could you
>>>>>> help?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the truck,
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> expected at all...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> rohit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

Deepak Dixit-2

yes exactly, and jQuery 1.4.2 is stable and we can use it without issue.
In future we can update it to 1.4.3 or 1.4.4 or any stable release.

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit




Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> I agree, we already use the jQuery branch in a custom project without
> issues so far.
> The only problem we crossed is related to jQuery 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 and
> we had to revert to 1.4.2.
> The problem was related to the use of jQuery.live() and was
> reproductible with OFBiz OOTB. I have still to report it to jQuery
> team, not easy
> http://docs.jquery.com/How_to_Report_Bugs
> http://bugs.jquery.com/search?ticket=on&q=live+1.4.3&page=2&noquickjump=1
> http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7340
> http://jsfiddle.net/
>
> There are options:
> * to put a tag in the trunk before merging, but it's static and does
> not help much. You have still to handle the "future" of the tag :/
> * to create a branch before mergin, but I don't like it much; it looks
> like a Prototype/Dojo fork....
>
> So yes I'd also vote to merge it in the trunk and not worry too much,
> we should be able to quickly handle issues, if any...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Divesh Dutta" <[hidden email]>
>> I think, if issues come then we can attack them. In this way we will
>> have release branch with Jquery.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Divesh Dutta.
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
>>
>>> I vote for doing a release branch first and then merge jQuery.
>>>
>>> This will let people to have a branch with the actual trunk in case the
>>> jQuery causes any issues to them.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>> 2010/12/1 Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> jQuery provide lot of pluginns and good thing is that all of these
>>>> pluginns
>>>> are cross browser compatible.
>>>>
>>>> So  +1 for  merge jQuery with trunk and then create release branch
>>>> with
>>>> jQuery.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Deepak Dixit
>>>> HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
>>>> Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>> Contact :- +91-98267-54548
>>>> Skype Id :- deepakdixit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Other opinions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would prefer to have the release branch before the merge with
>>>>>> jQuery.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/11/27 Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We may want to create a new release branch (before or after the
>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> jQuery?) and officially release 10.04.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, there is no hurry to merge jQuery, and a branch before
>>>>>>>> could be a
>>>>>>> good idea indeed.
>>>>>>>> This could be an answer for removing or not all Prototype/Dojo
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>>> With this branch people could rely on it for Prototype/Dojo. Those
>>>>>>> interested by the trunk are already leaving on the leading-edge and
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> not worry too much.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On the other hand maybe some would prefer to have jQuery in the
>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>> release? And also should we wait 11.xx? 11.01 would be okay for
>>>>>>> me...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW for those interested  please be sure to check this thread
>>>>>>>> (Bilgin
>>>>>>> noticed that I mixed 2 subjects in it: jQuery docs and demo and
>>>>>>> removing
>>>>>>> Prototype/Dojo from the trunk or not)
>>>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/mpdywy4ymkjddrpr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> What about creating a new release branch before merging the
>>>>>>>>> jquery ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/26 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully before new year, but we will need more testing,
>>>>>>>>>> could you
>>>>>>> help?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: "rohit" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> when can we expect the jQuery branch to be merged with the
>>>>>>>>>>> truck,
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> expected at all...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> rohit
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3060540.html 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

rohit
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacques,

I will be glad to help, however we work with the code in the trunk only.

If the code is reasonably complete as it appears from the discussions, i would like to see it merged in the trunk. As that will allow more people to test it and detect and report bugs if any.

Thanks,

Rohit
12