[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
Locked
12
12
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
 
|
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=all ]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-401. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed The way is now to stop using JPublish replaced by widgets > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: Jacques Le Roux > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=all ]
David E. Jones reopened OFBIZ-401: ---------------------------------- Assignee: David E. Jones (was: Jacques Le Roux) Why was this closed? It's not done yet.... I'll take it from here if you don't mind. > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: David E. Jones > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=comments#action_12448574 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-401: --------------------------------------- No problem for me David, I closed it because after reverting I posted on [30/oct./06 12:56 PM] (see above) that "If nobody complains I will close this issue in some days..." and I thought after your last email on this point that JPublish will be tossed away in a few days or weeks after all remaining forms using it will be changed to widgets. > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: David E. Jones > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=comments#action_12453534 ]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-401: ----------------------------------------- Now that all the JPublish pages have been migrated to the widgets I think that we should consider to perform some cleanups/upgrade of old jars (including this one) that were there just to make JPublish work. However we should also consider Si's concern about the issue with discontinued support to custom application... I'd suggest to go on with the cleanups and to prepare a Wiki page with instructions about this (warnings, how to migrate, maybe a patch to run the old code etc...) Does it make sense? Jacopo > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: David E. Jones > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=comments#action_12453621 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-401: --------------------------------------- +1 > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: David E. Jones > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=comments#action_12457267 ]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-401: -------------------------------------- Just a quick update: JPublish is now gone, so I'll work this in pretty soon (getting a bit tired tonight). > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: David E. Jones > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=all ]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-401. -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Thanks for your patience on this one Adam. Hopefully it's in SVN for good now, in rev 486518. > upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: OFBIZ-401 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Adam Heath > Assigned To: David E. Jones > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: bsf.diff > > > OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the package names. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
|
|
Hi ,
How to use this feature. How does the orderid gets generated Thanks in advance Chand ----- Original Message ----- From: "David E. Jones (JIRA)" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:59 PM Subject: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=all ] > > David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-401. > -------------------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > > Thanks for your patience on this one Adam. Hopefully it's in SVN for good > now, in rev 486518. > >> upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern >> ------------------------------------------ >> >> Key: OFBIZ-401 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 >> Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: framework >> Affects Versions: SVN trunk >> Reporter: Adam Heath >> Assigned To: David E. Jones >> Priority: Trivial >> Fix For: SVN trunk >> >> Attachments: bsf.diff >> >> >> OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. >> The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the >> package names. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > |
|
|
Dear all ,
I was trying to decip how WS10010 gets generated. While Checking SequenceUtil , Delegator , was wondering why does it seem to need parent. when we call partyId = delegator.getNextSeqId("Party"), does Party string links id generation to PARTY table ? Code in GeneralDelegator.java sql = "INSERT INTO " + parentUtil.tableName + " (" + parentUtil.nameColName + ", " + parentUtil.idColName + ") VALUES ('" + this.seqName + "', " + startSeqId + ")"; I have question where is string "WS" configured . Rest seems be based on bank and increment. Chand ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chandresh Turakhia" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:03 AM Subject: Order BlackListing... > Hi , > > How to use this feature. How does the orderid gets generated > > Thanks in advance > Chand > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David E. Jones (JIRA)" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:59 PM > Subject: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to something a bit more > modern > > >> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=all ] >> >> David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-401. >> -------------------------------- >> >> Resolution: Fixed >> >> Thanks for your patience on this one Adam. Hopefully it's in SVN for good >> now, in rev 486518. >> >>> upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern >>> ------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Key: OFBIZ-401 >>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 >>> Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) >>> Issue Type: Bug >>> Components: framework >>> Affects Versions: SVN trunk >>> Reporter: Adam Heath >>> Assigned To: David E. Jones >>> Priority: Trivial >>> Fix For: SVN trunk >>> >>> Attachments: bsf.diff >>> >>> >>> OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was hosted/maintained by ibm. >>> The attached patch fixes this(does a search/replace), changing the >>> package names. >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> - >> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> >> > > > |
|
|
WS comes from ProductStore.orderNumberPrefix. The
number is based on SequenceValueItem. I can't tell if you had another question in there. --- Chandresh Turakhia <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear all , > > I was trying to decip how WS10010 gets generated. > While Checking SequenceUtil , Delegator , was > wondering why does it seem to need parent. > > when we call partyId = > delegator.getNextSeqId("Party"), does Party string > links id generation to PARTY table ? > > Code in GeneralDelegator.java > sql = "INSERT INTO " + parentUtil.tableName + " (" + > parentUtil.nameColName + ", " + parentUtil.idColName > + ") VALUES ('" + this.seqName + "', " + startSeqId > + ")"; > > I have question where is string "WS" configured . > Rest seems be based on bank and increment. > > Chand > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandresh Turakhia" > <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:03 AM > Subject: Order BlackListing... > > > > Hi , > > > > How to use this feature. How does the orderid gets > generated > > > > Thanks in advance > > Chand > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David E. Jones (JIRA)" <[hidden email]> > > To: <[hidden email]> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:59 PM > > Subject: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to > something a bit more > > modern > > > > > >> [ > > ] > >> > >> David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-401. > >> -------------------------------- > >> > >> Resolution: Fixed > >> > >> Thanks for your patience on this one Adam. > Hopefully it's in SVN for good > >> now, in rev 486518. > >> > >>> upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > >>> ------------------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Key: OFBIZ-401 > >>> URL: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > >>> Project: OFBiz (The Open for > Business Project) > >>> Issue Type: Bug > >>> Components: framework > >>> Affects Versions: SVN trunk > >>> Reporter: Adam Heath > >>> Assigned To: David E. Jones > >>> Priority: Trivial > >>> Fix For: SVN trunk > >>> > >>> Attachments: bsf.diff > >>> > >>> > >>> OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was > hosted/maintained by ibm. > >>> The attached patch fixes this(does a > search/replace), changing the > >>> package names. > >> > >> -- > >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > >> - > >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one > of the administrators: > >> > > >> - > >> For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > |
|
|
Hi ,
Whats the best way to update the Order_number_prefix. Should Order_Number_Prefix be allowed for change once the store is operational. Becomes Design issues. Do we need some constraint. Basically trying to change transaction prefix based on weekdays or weekends. Changing from backend so that new transaction use different prefix gave errors in next time startup. Ofbiz ecommerce page even did not turn up. Chand ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Howe" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:52 AM Subject: Re: Order BlackListing... > WS comes from ProductStore.orderNumberPrefix. The > number is based on SequenceValueItem. I can't tell if > you had another question in there. > > > --- Chandresh Turakhia > <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Dear all , >> >> I was trying to decip how WS10010 gets generated. >> While Checking SequenceUtil , Delegator , was >> wondering why does it seem to need parent. >> >> when we call partyId = >> delegator.getNextSeqId("Party"), does Party string >> links id generation to PARTY table ? >> >> Code in GeneralDelegator.java >> sql = "INSERT INTO " + parentUtil.tableName + " (" + >> parentUtil.nameColName + ", " + parentUtil.idColName >> + ") VALUES ('" + this.seqName + "', " + startSeqId >> + ")"; >> >> I have question where is string "WS" configured . >> Rest seems be based on bank and increment. >> >> Chand >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chandresh Turakhia" >> <[hidden email]> >> To: <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:03 AM >> Subject: Order BlackListing... >> >> >> > Hi , >> > >> > How to use this feature. How does the orderid gets >> generated >> > >> > Thanks in advance >> > Chand >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "David E. Jones (JIRA)" <[hidden email]> >> > To: <[hidden email]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:59 PM >> > Subject: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf to >> something a bit more >> > modern >> > >> > >> >> [ >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401?page=all >> ] >> >> >> >> David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-401. >> >> -------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Resolution: Fixed >> >> >> >> Thanks for your patience on this one Adam. >> Hopefully it's in SVN for good >> >> now, in rev 486518. >> >> >> >>> upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern >> >>> ------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> >>> Key: OFBIZ-401 >> >>> URL: >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 >> >>> Project: OFBiz (The Open for >> Business Project) >> >>> Issue Type: Bug >> >>> Components: framework >> >>> Affects Versions: SVN trunk >> >>> Reporter: Adam Heath >> >>> Assigned To: David E. Jones >> >>> Priority: Trivial >> >>> Fix For: SVN trunk >> >>> >> >>> Attachments: bsf.diff >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it was >> hosted/maintained by ibm. >> >>> The attached patch fixes this(does a >> search/replace), changing the >> >>> package names. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> >> - >> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one >> of the administrators: >> >> >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> >> - >> >> For more information on JIRA, see: >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > > > |
|
|
This is really a User's mailing list question, you'll
tend to get a faster response there. IMO I would never convey information about a record through a convention of the primary key. The only time I would have the primary key have actual information about the record is if it's a natural part of the record (ie a credit card number being a primary key in a table of credit cards if security weren't an issue). If you want to convey information about when an order was placed do it based on the actual data of when it was placed. For instance when an order is placed, the time that the order was created is entered in OrderStatus. Base your application distinguishing when it was placed based on that, not on some convention of the orderId prefix. In the enterprise world, your data is going to live long after your application and more specifically, long after the developer who decided on the conventions will be employed by the user of the data. This is best shown in the difficulties that arise in the Product entity by using Product.productId as both a primary key and the item number that people place orders on. If your productId wasn't relevant data before it was created in the database, the only thing that extra data should be relevant to is the database, not the people using the data. --- Chandresh Turakhia <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi , > > Whats the best way to update the > Order_number_prefix. > > Should Order_Number_Prefix be allowed for change > once the store is > operational. Becomes Design issues. Do we need some > constraint. > > Basically trying to change transaction prefix based > on weekdays or weekends. > > Changing from backend so that new transaction use > different prefix gave > errors in next time startup. Ofbiz ecommerce page > even did not turn up. > > Chand > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Howe" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:52 AM > Subject: Re: Order BlackListing... > > > > WS comes from ProductStore.orderNumberPrefix. The > > number is based on SequenceValueItem. I can't > tell if > > you had another question in there. > > > > > > --- Chandresh Turakhia > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> Dear all , > >> > >> I was trying to decip how WS10010 gets generated. > >> While Checking SequenceUtil , Delegator , was > >> wondering why does it seem to need parent. > >> > >> when we call partyId = > >> delegator.getNextSeqId("Party"), does Party > string > >> links id generation to PARTY table ? > >> > >> Code in GeneralDelegator.java > >> sql = "INSERT INTO " + parentUtil.tableName + " > (" + > >> parentUtil.nameColName + ", " + > parentUtil.idColName > >> + ") VALUES ('" + this.seqName + "', " + > startSeqId > >> + ")"; > >> > >> I have question where is string "WS" configured . > >> Rest seems be based on bank and increment. > >> > >> Chand > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Chandresh Turakhia" > >> <[hidden email]> > >> To: <[hidden email]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:03 AM > >> Subject: Order BlackListing... > >> > >> > >> > Hi , > >> > > >> > How to use this feature. How does the orderid > gets > >> generated > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance > >> > Chand > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "David E. Jones (JIRA)" <[hidden email]> > >> > To: <[hidden email]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:59 PM > >> > Subject: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-401) upgrade bsf > to > >> something a bit more > >> > modern > >> > > >> > > >> >> [ > >> > > > > >> ] > >> >> > >> >> David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-401. > >> >> -------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> Resolution: Fixed > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for your patience on this one Adam. > >> Hopefully it's in SVN for good > >> >> now, in rev 486518. > >> >> > >> >>> upgrade bsf to something a bit more modern > >> >>> ------------------------------------------ > >> >>> > >> >>> Key: OFBIZ-401 > >> >>> URL: > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-401 > >> >>> Project: OFBiz (The Open for > >> Business Project) > >> >>> Issue Type: Bug > >> >>> Components: framework > >> >>> Affects Versions: SVN trunk > >> >>> Reporter: Adam Heath > >> >>> Assigned To: David E. Jones > >> >>> Priority: Trivial > >> >>> Fix For: SVN trunk > >> >>> > >> >>> Attachments: bsf.diff > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> OfBiz still uses a bsf version from when it > was > >> hosted/maintained by ibm. > >> >>> The attached patch fixes this(does a > >> search/replace), changing the > >> >>> package names. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> This message is automatically generated by > JIRA. > >> >> - > >> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact > one > >> of the administrators: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> - > >> >> For more information on JIRA, see: > >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |