[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7129) Recognise "BASE TABLE" table type in metadata

[Nicolas Malin (Jira)]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Paul Foxworthy updated OFBIZ-7129:
----------------------------------
    Attachment: OFBIZ-7129_BaseTableMetadata.patch

> Recognise "BASE TABLE" table type in metadata
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-7129
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7129
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: framework
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>            Reporter: Paul Foxworthy
>            Assignee: Paul Foxworthy
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-7129_BaseTableMetadata.patch
>
>
> In framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/jdbc/DatabaseUtil.java, the getTableNames method looks for table types of "TABLE", "VIEW", "ALIAS" and "SYNONYM".
> MariaDB produces a table type of "BASE TABLE", so OFBiz didn't detect the tables were there, and attempted to create them. In fact, the tables do exist so the create failed.
> The JDBC docs suggest that plain "TABLE" is a "typical" value for table type (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/sql/DatabaseMetaData.html#getTables-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String:A-)
> But it seems "BASE TABLE" is more standards compliant - see for example http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt page 576. I assume some JDBC drivers transform "BASE TABLE" to plain "TABLE", but the MariaDB one does not.
> I've attached a patch so OFBiz will recognise "BASE TABLE" if that's what it receives in the metadata.

--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)