yes.. I was using the 'link' button, partyrelationship this is what I
wanted.
thank you
Regards,
Abdullah
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Hans Bakker
<
[hidden email]>wrote:
> it looks like you use the 'link' button in profile? This function has a
> bit a strange name because it is more a 'merge' function to remove
> duplicate parties.
>
> use partyrelationship and add a person in the role contact to a account
> or a parytgroup in the role account to a person
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 13:01 +0530, abdullah shaikh wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > I want to create a party group, with contact information, which will
> have
> > some parties (users), and these party group users should also have their
> own
> > individual contact information.
> >
> > Like -
> >
> > Party Group -> CompanyABC (contact information of the company, lets say
> >
[hidden email])
> >
> > and CompanyABC will have
> >
> > Party -> User1 - with their their own contact information
> (for
> > eg.
[hidden email])
> > Party -> User2 (
[hidden email])
> >
> >
> > What's happening is when I create a party group and assign a party user
> to
> > it, the party group contact info is there, but the party status is set to
> > PARTY_DISABLED, why ?, and all the party contact information is lost ?
> >
> >
> > How should I achieve the above scenario ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Abdullah
> --
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>
>
Locked
