ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
Locked
ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
 
|
while working with yahoo API
I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation of the apache? |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz
HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used it in my mashup POC code - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. -Adrian BJ Freeman wrote: > while working with yahoo API > I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; > which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient > is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation > of the apache? > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for
implementing user test screens. this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz one is used in the framework. it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to append the apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: > I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz > HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. > > If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then > take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used it in > my mashup POC code - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. > > -Adrian > > BJ Freeman wrote: >> while working with yahoo API >> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation >> of the apache? >> > > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. It's
only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult change to make. -Adrian BJ Freeman wrote: > I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for > implementing user test screens. > this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz one is > used in the framework. > it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to append the > apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. > > Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >> >> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then >> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used it in >> my mashup POC code - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >> >> -Adrian >> >> BJ Freeman wrote: >>> while working with yahoo API >>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation >>> of the apache? >>> >> > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
works for me.
it has been moved around found it under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: > I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. It's > only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult change to > make. > > -Adrian > > BJ Freeman wrote: >> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >> implementing user test screens. >> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz one is >> used in the framework. >> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to append the >> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. >> >> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>> >>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then >>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used it in >>> my mashup POC code - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> while working with yahoo API >>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation >>>> of the apache? >>>> >>> >> > > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz
structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: > works for me. > it has been moved around > found it under > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ > > > Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. It's >> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult change to >> make. >> >> -Adrian >> >> BJ Freeman wrote: >>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>> implementing user test screens. >>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz one is >>> used in the framework. >>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to append the >>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. >>> >>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>> >>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then >>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used it in >>>> my mashup POC code - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation >>>>> of the apache? >>>>> >> > > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to
the new class. -Adrian BJ Freeman wrote: > just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz > structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used > I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. > > BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >> works for me. >> it has been moved around >> found it under >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >> >> >> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. It's >>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult change to >>> make. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>> implementing user test screens. >>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz one is >>>> used in the framework. >>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to append the >>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. >>>> >>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>> >>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then >>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used it in >>>>> my mashup POC code - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>> >>>>> -Adrian >>>>> >>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient implementation >>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>> >> > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in the
jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does not support the code I have. I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it would be best to use the current httpclient. I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: > I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to > the new class. > > -Adrian > > BJ Freeman wrote: >> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz >> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >> >> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>> works for me. >>> it has been moved around >>> found it under >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. It's >>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult change to >>>> make. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>> one is >>>>> used in the framework. >>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>> append the >>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. >>>>> >>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then >>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>> it in >>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>> >>> >> > > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
Administrator
|
I'm resurrecting this thread because, as outlined by this other thread http://markmail.org/message/j4s6tq2ccit3wtbf, unlike Apache
HttpClient, OFBiz's is not closing connections. I have not the time at the moment to replace it, but I'd like to do so in October or November. I will open a Jira then (this message more as a self reminder...) Interesting link also http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html/connmgmt.html Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in the > jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does > not support the code I have. > I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it would be > best to use the current httpclient. > I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure > out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. > > Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: >> I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to >> the new class. >> >> -Adrian >> >> BJ Freeman wrote: >>> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz >>> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >>> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >>> >>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>>> works for me. >>>> it has been moved around >>>> found it under >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. It's >>>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult change to >>>>> make. >>>>> >>>>> -Adrian >>>>> >>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>>> one is >>>>>> used in the framework. >>>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>>> append the >>>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more versatile. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, then >>>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>>> it in >>>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
Just as a note I believe a major redactor using the java.nio.channels
library, would solve a lot of problems. connecion are manage internally. http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/nio/channels/package-summary.html Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/17/2011 9:13 AM: > I'm resurrecting this thread because, as outlined by this other thread > http://markmail.org/message/j4s6tq2ccit3wtbf, unlike Apache > HttpClient, OFBiz's is not closing connections. > I have not the time at the moment to replace it, but I'd like to do so > in October or November. I will open a Jira then (this message > more as a self reminder...) > > Interesting link also > http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html/connmgmt.html > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in the >> jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does >> not support the code I have. >> I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it would be >> best to use the current httpclient. >> I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure >> out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. >> >> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: >>> I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to >>> the new class. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz >>>> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >>>> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >>>> >>>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>>>> works for me. >>>>> it has been moved around >>>>> found it under >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. >>>>>> It's >>>>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult >>>>>> change to >>>>>> make. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>>>> one is >>>>>>> used in the framework. >>>>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>>>> append the >>>>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more >>>>>>> versatile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, >>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
Administrator
|
Thanks BJ,
This is interesting for other subjects. I think replacing the HttpClient still stands. Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > Just as a note I believe a major redactor using the java.nio.channels > library, would solve a lot of problems. connecion are manage internally. > > http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/nio/channels/package-summary.html > > Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/17/2011 9:13 AM: >> I'm resurrecting this thread because, as outlined by this other thread >> http://markmail.org/message/j4s6tq2ccit3wtbf, unlike Apache >> HttpClient, OFBiz's is not closing connections. >> I have not the time at the moment to replace it, but I'd like to do so >> in October or November. I will open a Jira then (this message >> more as a self reminder...) >> >> Interesting link also >> http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html/connmgmt.html >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>> I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in the >>> jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does >>> not support the code I have. >>> I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it would be >>> best to use the current httpclient. >>> I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure >>> out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. >>> >>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: >>>> I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to >>>> the new class. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz >>>>> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >>>>> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >>>>> >>>>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>>>>> works for me. >>>>>> it has been moved around >>>>>> found it under >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>>>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. >>>>>>> It's >>>>>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult >>>>>>> change to >>>>>>> make. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>>>>> one is >>>>>>>> used in the framework. >>>>>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>>>>> append the >>>>>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more >>>>>>>> versatile. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, >>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Ok a longer version of my terse reply.
there are two concerns in this thread you brought up. 1) TIMENOUT 2) implementing a different package that does not support the newer java.nio.channel like the APJ does. #1 is something than if you set to long it will waste response time, on a bad connection, if to short will have the effect in the Email. when I started in 96 the latency of the internet was uder 100 ms max. Now the latency of the net is upwards of what used to be considered intoloralbe latency (200 ms). On top of that you have the Server response time which during the Holidays gets really long so you will time out before the server responds causing resends that only bog down the server more. the above is a long winded way of saying your time out has to change with the conditions. #2 in looking at the http library they are still using the java.net for connection. So in my estimation, we do a re-factor of ofbiz to java.nio and fix the httpclient we have. Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/17/2011 9:13 AM: > I'm resurrecting this thread because, as outlined by this other thread > http://markmail.org/message/j4s6tq2ccit3wtbf, unlike Apache > HttpClient, OFBiz's is not closing connections. > I have not the time at the moment to replace it, but I'd like to do so > in October or November. I will open a Jira then (this message > more as a self reminder...) > > Interesting link also > http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html/connmgmt.html > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in the >> jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does >> not support the code I have. >> I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it would be >> best to use the current httpclient. >> I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure >> out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. >> >> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: >>> I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to >>> the new class. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz >>>> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >>>> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >>>> >>>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>>>> works for me. >>>>> it has been moved around >>>>> found it under >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. >>>>>> It's >>>>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult >>>>>> change to >>>>>> make. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>>>> one is >>>>>>> used in the framework. >>>>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>>>> append the >>>>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more >>>>>>> versatile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, >>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
Administrator
|
1) This is what I mean: http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/performance.html#Connection_persistence
In other words, not relying on the SO to release connections. Most of the time it's not a big deal, but in some cases this can be annoying 2) You are welcome https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4430. Maybe it's not harder indeed... Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > Ok a longer version of my terse reply. > there are two concerns in this thread you brought up. > 1) TIMENOUT > 2) implementing a different package that does not support the newer > java.nio.channel like the APJ does. > #1 is something than if you set to long it will waste response time, on > a bad connection, if to short will have the effect in the Email. > when I started in 96 the latency of the internet was uder 100 ms max. > Now the latency of the net is upwards of what used to be considered > intoloralbe latency (200 ms). > On top of that you have the Server response time which during the > Holidays gets really long so you will time out before the server > responds causing resends that only bog down the server more. > the above is a long winded way of saying your time out has to change > with the conditions. > #2 in looking at the http library they are still using the java.net for > connection. So in my estimation, we do a re-factor of ofbiz to java.nio > and fix the httpclient we have. > > > Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/17/2011 9:13 AM: >> I'm resurrecting this thread because, as outlined by this other thread >> http://markmail.org/message/j4s6tq2ccit3wtbf, unlike Apache >> HttpClient, OFBiz's is not closing connections. >> I have not the time at the moment to replace it, but I'd like to do so >> in October or November. I will open a Jira then (this message >> more as a self reminder...) >> >> Interesting link also >> http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html/connmgmt.html >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>> I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in the >>> jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does >>> not support the code I have. >>> I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it would be >>> best to use the current httpclient. >>> I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure >>> out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. >>> >>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: >>>> I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point people to >>>> the new class. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with ofbiz >>>>> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >>>>> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >>>>> >>>>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>>>>> works for me. >>>>>> it has been moved around >>>>>> found it under >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>>>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. >>>>>>> It's >>>>>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult >>>>>>> change to >>>>>>> make. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>>>>> one is >>>>>>>> used in the framework. >>>>>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>>>>> append the >>>>>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more >>>>>>>> versatile. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, >>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> |
Re: ofbiz HttpClient versus org.apache.commons.httpclient.
|
|
actually I was suggesting that ofbiz as a whole would be re-factored to NIO
My underlying motivation is to stop expanding libraries and start only having what ofbiz is really using. and that is a harder effort but well worth it. But I am willing to work with the jira. Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2011 11:51 PM: > 1) This is what I mean: > http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/performance.html#Connection_persistence > In other words, not relying on the SO to release connections. Most of > the time it's not a big deal, but in some cases this can be annoying > 2) You are welcome https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4430. > Maybe it's not harder indeed... > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> Ok a longer version of my terse reply. >> there are two concerns in this thread you brought up. >> 1) TIMENOUT >> 2) implementing a different package that does not support the newer >> java.nio.channel like the APJ does. >> #1 is something than if you set to long it will waste response time, on >> a bad connection, if to short will have the effect in the Email. >> when I started in 96 the latency of the internet was uder 100 ms max. >> Now the latency of the net is upwards of what used to be considered >> intoloralbe latency (200 ms). >> On top of that you have the Server response time which during the >> Holidays gets really long so you will time out before the server >> responds causing resends that only bog down the server more. >> the above is a long winded way of saying your time out has to change >> with the conditions. >> #2 in looking at the http library they are still using the java.net for >> connection. So in my estimation, we do a re-factor of ofbiz to java.nio >> and fix the httpclient we have. >> >> >> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/17/2011 9:13 AM: >>> I'm resurrecting this thread because, as outlined by this other thread >>> http://markmail.org/message/j4s6tq2ccit3wtbf, unlike Apache >>> HttpClient, OFBiz's is not closing connections. >>> I have not the time at the moment to replace it, but I'd like to do so >>> in October or November. I will open a Jira then (this message >>> more as a self reminder...) >>> >>> Interesting link also >>> http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html/connmgmt.html >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>> I have done more investigation, and found the methods I depend on in >>>> the >>>> jar come from java 1.31. in looking at the current httpclient, it does >>>> not support the code I have. >>>> I am not sure what I will do at this point but for the trunk it >>>> would be >>>> best to use the current httpclient. >>>> I am still going thru the current httpclient class in ofbiz to figure >>>> out how is would be used, mostly in communication with third parties. >>>> >>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 2:39 PM: >>>>> I was thinking we could deprecate the constructors, and point >>>>> people to >>>>> the new class. >>>>> >>>>> -Adrian >>>>> >>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>> just as a note there are methods in the ofbiz one that work with >>>>>> ofbiz >>>>>> structure. I would like to review those to see if they can be used >>>>>> I guess the proper steps is to depreciate those. >>>>>> >>>>>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:47 PM: >>>>>>> works for me. >>>>>>> it has been moved around >>>>>>> found it under >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:37 PM: >>>>>>>> I'd rather switch to the commons one and eliminate the OFBiz one. >>>>>>>> It's >>>>>>>> only used in one or two places, so it wouldn't be a difficult >>>>>>>> change to >>>>>>>> make. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>> I have been looking at HTMLUnit since our last conversation, for >>>>>>>>> implementing user test screens. >>>>>>>>> this is more that there are two HttpClient classes and the ofbiz >>>>>>>>> one is >>>>>>>>> used in the framework. >>>>>>>>> it seemed the simplest solution would be to use implements to >>>>>>>>> append the >>>>>>>>> apache one to the ofbiz one thus making the ofbiz one more >>>>>>>>> versatile. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/23/2008 1:06 PM: >>>>>>>>>> I would recommend using any suitable replacement for the OFBiz >>>>>>>>>> HttpClient - it is very rudimentary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you need an HTTP client that handles cookies and JavaScript, >>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>> take a look at HTMLUnit - http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net. I used >>>>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>>>> my mashup POC code - >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1873. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> while working with yahoo API >>>>>>>>>>> I came accross the org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient; >>>>>>>>>>> which has more functionality than the ofbiz HttpClient >>>>>>>>>>> is there any problem with making the ofbiz an HttpClient >>>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>>> of the apache? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > > |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |