proposal: deleting multiple rows

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Wai
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

proposal: deleting multiple rows

Wai
Hello All,

For the product features listing of https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/EditProductFeatures?productId=FA-001

I propose the following changes:

1. Standardize on having the checkboxes at the left most column
2. create a button called "Delete selected" to allow a user to select multiple entries for deletion.  This would complement the existing "Update" button that perform updates on multiple columns.

Once the change is implemented, others can use the same method to apply to other screens where appropriate.

Does anyone have any objections?

Thanks,
Wai
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: proposal: deleting multiple rows

BJ Freeman
Sounds good,
just put a global through date to be added to all "deleted" records.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices

Wai Tam sent the following on 6/30/2010 9:08 AM:


=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>

>
> Hello All,
>
> For the product features listing of
> https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/EditProductFeatures?productId=FA-001
>
> I propose the following changes:
>
> 1. Standardize on having the checkboxes at the left most column
> 2. create a button called "Delete selected" to allow a user to select
> multiple entries for deletion.  This would complement the existing "Update"
> button that perform updates on multiple columns.
>
> Once the change is implemented, others can use the same method to apply to
> other screens where appropriate.
>
> Does anyone have any objections?
>
> Thanks,
> Wai