This is true. To be more clear, performance would not just simply
suffer, it would become unreasonable and for larger databases the
query would take minutes or even hours to run. It is amazingly
expensive to create very wide temporary tables.
-David
On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:44 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> Is the intention to remove the findParty service and if so, replace
> it with what? The dynamic view that it used in that service cannot
> simply be replaced with a static view entity and the findGeneric
> service, well it can but performance would suffer for it.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 5/11/2009, at 4:07 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
>
>> I will not mind _if_ Existing artifacts (ftl file and findParty
>> service) are not removed. This will allow me to keep using them
>> till we know that new artifacts match or exceed features available
>> in old ones.
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Anil Patel
>> HotWax Media Inc
>>
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com>>
http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/sponsors/sponsors>>
>> On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>>
>>> Can the community have a look at the new leads/contact/account
>>> findlist
>>> screens in SFA?
>>>
>>> If this is acceptable shouldn't we replace the find/list screens in
>>> partymgr the same way?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
http://www.antwebsystems.com :
>>> Quality OFBiz support for competitive rates....
>>>
>>
>