rmi jar renamed

[BJ Freeman]

       <jar jarfile="${build.dir}/lib/${name}-rmi.raj">
 is this by design?

[David E Jones]

Yes

On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:20 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

>       <jar jarfile="${build.dir}/lib/${name}-rmi.raj">
> is this by design?

[BJ Freeman]

So should the RMI in the ofbiz-containers.xml be commented out, as well,
or have I missed something?

David E Jones sent the following on 12/6/2007 2:26 AM:
>
> Yes
>
> On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:20 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>>       <jar jarfile="${build.dir}/lib/${name}-rmi.raj">
>> is this by design?
>

[Scott Gray]

You've missed something.  ofbiz-service-rmi.raj is a client library not
intended to be run on the server, hence the raj instead of jar.

Regards
Scott

On 07/12/2007, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> So should the RMI in the ofbiz-containers.xml be commented out, as well,
> or have I missed something?
>
> David E Jones sent the following on 12/6/2007 2:26 AM:
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:20 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> >
> >>       <jar jarfile="${build.dir}/lib/${name}-rmi.raj">
> >> is this by design?
> >
>

[BJ Freeman]

thanks scott will read more.
:)

Scott Gray sent the following on 12/6/2007 9:20 PM:

> You've missed something.  ofbiz-service-rmi.raj is a client library not
> intended to be run on the server, hence the raj instead of jar.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 07/12/2007, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> So should the RMI in the ofbiz-containers.xml be commented out, as well,
>> or have I missed something?
>>
>> David E Jones sent the following on 12/6/2007 2:26 AM:
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:20 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>
>>>>       <jar jarfile="${build.dir}/lib/${name}-rmi.raj">
>>>> is this by design?
>