I am currently with a rather large company supporting the evaluation of
ofbiz as a major source of enterprise services using the soap webservices/service-engine present in OFBiz. One of the architects looked at the SOAP implementation and saw that the error messages are not according the standard in: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383507 Are there any objections replacing the OFBiz error messaging with the standardized way? Or should we make it a configurable option? Any opinions? Regards, Hans -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. |
Obviously the SOAP error messaging only, not the ofbiz service result
messaging Regards, Hans On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:39 +0300, Hans Bakker wrote: > I am currently with a rather large company supporting the evaluation of > ofbiz as a major source of enterprise services using the soap > webservices/service-engine present in OFBiz. > > One of the architects looked at the SOAP implementation and saw that the > error messages are not according the standard in: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383507 > > > Are there any objections replacing the OFBiz error messaging with the > standardized way? Or should we make it a configurable option? > > Any opinions? > > Regards, > Hans > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. |
+ 1 for such a change
Bilgin On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Hans Bakker <[hidden email]>wrote: > Obviously the SOAP error messaging only, not the ofbiz service result > messaging > > Regards, > Hans > > On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:39 +0300, Hans Bakker wrote: > > I am currently with a rather large company supporting the evaluation of > > ofbiz as a major source of enterprise services using the soap > > webservices/service-engine present in OFBiz. > > > > One of the architects looked at the SOAP implementation and saw that the > > error messages are not according the standard in: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383507 > > > > > > Are there any objections replacing the OFBiz error messaging with the > > standardized way? Or should we make it a configurable option? > > > > Any opinions? > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > Antwebsystems.com <http://twitter.com/hansbak%0AAntwebsystems.com>: > Quality services for competitive rates. > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by hans_bakker
I can see any problems to follow SOAP best practices
Jacques From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> > Obviously the SOAP error messaging only, not the ofbiz service result > messaging > > Regards, > Hans > > On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:39 +0300, Hans Bakker wrote: >> I am currently with a rather large company supporting the evaluation of >> ofbiz as a major source of enterprise services using the soap >> webservices/service-engine present in OFBiz. >> >> One of the architects looked at the SOAP implementation and saw that the >> error messages are not according the standard in: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383507 >> >> >> Are there any objections replacing the OFBiz error messaging with the >> standardized way? Or should we make it a configurable option? >> >> Any opinions? >> >> Regards, >> Hans >> > > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |