Author: jleroux
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:22:06 2016 New Revision: 1749396 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749396&view=rev Log: Fixes misc. minor syntax issues Modified: ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-getting-started.html ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-project-overview.html Modified: ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-getting-started.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-getting-started.html?rev=1749396&r1=1749395&r2=1749396&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-getting-started.html (original) +++ ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-getting-started.html Mon Jun 20 20:22:06 2016 @@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ <!-- content-wrap starts --> <div id="content-wrap" class="clearfix"> <div id="main"> - <h2>Apache OFBiz® Getting Started</h3> + <h2>Apache OFBiz® Getting Started</h2> <h3>The What, Why and How of Apache OFBiz</h3> -<P>The basic structure and driving force behind OFBiz has a lot to do with the goals and actualization of the release process.</p> +<p>The basic structure and driving force behind OFBiz has a lot to do with the goals and actualization of the release process.</p> <p>OFBiz is and always has been a community-driven open source project. There is no central commercial organization that drives the development of OFBiz or derives a project from the intellectual property of the software or other project assets. This is formalized now that OFBiz is a project in the Apache Software Foundation.</p> <p>Because of this OFBiz always has been and always will be just what users who contribute to the project want it to be. There are many different individuals and groups involved with many different needs and our goal is to define and follow development and release policies that serve the needs of these parties.</p> <p>So, let's start with that...</p> @@ -51,21 +51,21 @@ <h3>How Do I Decide What to Use?</h3> <p>From a project user perspective there is one main question that can help determine which way they will want to get OFBiz: <b>Do I want to contribute to the open source project?</b></p> -<p>For this question there are 3 main answers: +<p>For this question there are 3 main answers:</p> <ol> <li><b>Yes, definitely</b>: I want to contribute to design, coding, and testing efforts and thereby collaborate with others to more effectively and efficiently satisfy the long-term requirements from me, my clients, or my employer</li> <li><b>Kind of</b>: I want to stay on the cutting edge and participate with testing and feedback, but I'm not in a position to participate in development and/or in the near future I will need something more reliable and supported and that won't change very much</li> <li><b>Not really</b>: I'm happy to offer feedback, but I really need something that will work well now and well into the future so we can get things going in our organization</li> </ol> -</p> -<p>For each answer there is a recommended way to get OFBiz: + +<p>For each answer there is a recommended way to get OFBiz:</p> <ol> <li>Get the code straight from the code repository (SVN) <b>trunk</b> and update frequently through development, stopping before your integration or final pre-deployment testing, and periodically even after production deployment according to your ongoing develop/deploy plan; note that when you are not updating from SVN you should continue to watch the commits for bug fixes to patch into your code base</li> <li>Get the code from the code repository (SVN) <b>release branch</b> and keep updated or patched regularly as fixes are committed and the branch stabilizes over time; when getting started choose the most recent branch, even if it is very new; when new release branches are created update to them soon after the branch is done</li> <li>Get a built release package or the code from a release branch tag, and update as new pre-built release packages and tags are created; these will only represent fixes and unless a major issue arises they will be backward compatible and generally safe to update or patch to; when getting started choose a release branch that has been around for at least 2-3 months and that has no major outstanding issues in the issue tracker to assure that it has stabilized; when new release branches are created wait until you are ready to do a major upgrade and possibly need to modify your code and configuration, and wait at least until the prospective branch has stabilized before moving to it</li> </ol> -</p> + </div> <!-- main ends --> Modified: ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-project-overview.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-project-overview.html?rev=1749396&r1=1749395&r2=1749396&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-project-overview.html (original) +++ ofbiz/site/apache-ofbiz-project-overview.html Mon Jun 20 20:22:06 2016 @@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ Campaigns including advertisements, part <h4>Work Effort</h4> <p>A Work Effort can be one of many things including a task, project, project phase, to-do item, calendar item, or even a Workflow Activity.</p> <p><b>Notice</b> : OFBiz gave up on Workflow Engines. Shark was implemented last but never really used in OFBiz. Instead of -using a Workflow Engine, OFBiz uses an <A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_Driven_Architecture" class="external-link" - rel="nofollow">Event Driven Architecture (EDA)</A> and ECAs (SECA, EECA, MECA) are used in OFBiz to drive the Workflow. ECA is the +using a Workflow Engine, OFBiz uses an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_Driven_Architecture" class="external-link" + rel="nofollow">Event Driven Architecture (EDA)</a> and ECAs (SECA, EECA, MECA) are used in OFBiz to drive the Workflow. ECA is the acronym of Event Condition Action. SECAs are for Services (triggered on services conditions), EECA are for Entity (triggered on entities conditions), MECAs are for Mail.</p> <!-- |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |