http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Users-product-requirements-tp138923p138928.html
> Fred, Si,
>
> the "getRequirementsForSupplier" is really not completely implemented
> right now: the service definition should be ok but the service
> implementation is clearly not; so, yes at least it should look at the
> party to fiter out the requirements...
>
> Fred, if you want to complete the service and prepare a patch I'd be
> happy to review and commit it.
>
> Jacopo
>
> Fred Forester wrote:
>
>>Si,
>>
>>I assume then that this is a bug. would replacing
>>"getRequirementsForSupplier" with a Dynamic View be the way to go?
>>
>>thanx
>>Fred
>>
>>
>>Fred Forester wrote:
>>
>>>Si,
>>>
>>>tried that, made no difference. I also do not see any reference to
>>>partyId being used by that code since it only uses the Requirements
>>>entity. I would think a view is needed to tie Requirements to
>>>SupplierProduct and maybe even Party to get the supplier name.
>>>
>>>btw, I used this url
>>>
https://10.10.1.101:8443/ordermgr/control/RequirementsForSupplier?partyId=15>>>
>>>Thanx
>>>Fred
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Si Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sounds like a bug to me. Does the URL add a partyId for the supplier?
>>>>What if you add the supplier partyId to the URL (just try it manually in
>>>>your browser.)
>>>>
>>>>Si
>>>>
>>>>Fred Forester wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>when creating a purchase order there is a Short Cuts link for
>>>>>"Requirements" which ends up here "RequirementsForSupplier" however, the
>>>>>list of requirments seems to be a list of all approved requirements
>>>>>regardless of the current supplier for the purchase order. is this the
>>>>>intended purpose?
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanx
>>>>>Fred
>>>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>