>>Yes to both. However, PartyRelationship can be a bit tricky. Search the emails from last Nov/Dec here or look in our crm app's seed data for some examples of how to conform to OFBiz standards. Last of all--did you get my emails last week, sent from our demo ofbiz server? :) Charles Johnson wrote:Just some general advice about Party/PartyRole please: a. I take it that it's legitimate to leave Party 'Company' with that id and to alter its other attributes as appropriate? b. Is it legitimate for 'Company' to have the role EMPLOYER, as opposed to that role being taken by a Person? CJ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Last of all--did you get my emails last week, sent from our demo ofbiz server? :) >> Yes i did thanks and thought i'd replied to you about that. You kindly sent me two sets. One of the responses i sent was undeliverable and that i only just discovered today. Let me know if you need more info. >> However, PartyRelationship can be a bit tricky. >> Indeed. This seems to be anomalous (hope you can view html mail in this case):
|
||||
|
//=============================================================================================
Description
|
From Date
|
|
Party 10050 in role Salaried
employee is a Employee of party Company in role Employer
|
2003-01-01 00:00:00.000
|
[Remove] |
Party Company in role Employer
is a Employee of party 10050 in role Salaried
employee
|
2003-01-01 00:00:00.000
|
[Remove] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |