These are mostly refactoring.
did not find when the entity change happened.
order_id with orderId. It has been tested for creating orders, shipping,
viewing. We need some more testing to find any cases that were missed.
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 11:43 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
>> You are going to have to upgrade your application, and probably your
>> framework. You at least need the world pay code and Productworker.java
>> upgraded.
>> as I have found this usually means that there are other underlying
>> changes in other sections that need to change.
>> I suggest you copy the config files you have changed new name then when
>> you port over the new code, your old configurations will be intact and
>> you can update the new ones.
>>
>
> Do you know when this issue was fixed. I couldn't find any mention in
> jira or elsewhere.
>
> I had a look at the latest svn of ofbiz and the readme in accounting/lib
> suggests to just drop the Worldpay stuff in said directory. Now the
> Worldpay provided stuff (emailed to me last week) is version 0.16 (and
> seems to date from around 2000) whereas the Ofbiz bundled version is
> 0.17.
>
> So I am confused Worldpay/Ofbiz has worked in the past and also works
> now yet it appears Worldpay hasn't changed since 2000. The obvious, but
> not necessarily correct, assumption is that things got broken/fixed in
> Ofbiz in between times. The revision I am using is 5274 from about July
> 2005.
>
> Anybody using an Ofbiz revision from around this period with Worldpay
> working?
>
> Assuming I do have to upgrade which version/revision would you consider
> to be the most suitable (incl Worldpay working) for production use?
>
> Many thanks in anticipation.
> Iain.
>
>> You will have to update the paymentProperties and paymentPropertiesPath
>> in the web.xml
>>
>> Iain Mac Donald sent the following on 7/11/2006 11:11 AM:
>>> OK nearly got this Worldpay/Ofbiz integration sorted. Initialisation has
>>> now worked. However, I am still unable to get a successful callback.
>>>
>>> I have attached the exception I received (see below). This appears to be
>>> exactly as described in this message on the dev list
>>>
>>>
http://lists.ofbiz.org/pipermail/dev/2004-November/006904.html>>>
>>> Anyone know if this got resolved?
>>>
>